qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] QEMU Gating CI


From: Cleber Rosa
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] QEMU Gating CI
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:13:06 -0400

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:51:34PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:48:38PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 18:22, Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Sure.  It's important that PATCH 2/2 in this series is included in a
> > > branch that you need to push to the "staging" branch on the
> > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu repo (it could be just that one
> > > patch).  Then, you can run:
> > >
> > >   ./scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status --verbose -w
> > >
> > > And that should be it.  You can drop '--verbose' if you just want the
> > > final outcome as the result.
> > 
> > I tried this (local branch named "staging", pushed to gitlab
> > remote "staging" branch), but it said:
> > 
> > e104462:bionic:qemu$ ./scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status --verbose -w
> > ERROR: No pipeline found
> > failure
> > 
> > It does seem to have kicked off the pipeline on gitlab though:
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/171671136/builds
> > OTOH I can't see anything on that web page that suggests that
> > it's submitting jobs to the s390 or aarch64 boxes -- is it
> > intended to?
> 
> It looks like those jobs are all in the "test" stage of the pipeline, so
> it is waiting for the earlier stages to complete before running the jobs.
>

Hi Daniel,

Right.  IIUC the criteria for putting jobs in the test stage at the
moment is "if they include running tests (in addition to builds) they
should be in test".  Looking at that from this perspective, they're in
the right place.

But, these jobs don't depend on anything else, including container
builds, so there's no reason to have them wait for so long to run.
The solution may be to rename the first stage (containers) to something
more generic (and unfortunately less descriptive) so that all of them
will run concurrently and earlier.

Thoughts?
- Cleber.

> Regards,
> Daniel
> -- 
> |: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]