[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug 1888923] Re: Configured Memory access latency and bandwidth not tak
From: |
Vishnu Dixit |
Subject: |
[Bug 1888923] Re: Configured Memory access latency and bandwidth not taking effect |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:40:15 -0000 |
It indeed was a non NUMA machine
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888923
Title:
Configured Memory access latency and bandwidth not taking effect
Status in QEMU:
Invalid
Bug description:
I was trying to configure latencies and bandwidths between nodes in a
NUMA emulation using QEMU 5.0.0.
Host : Ubuntu 20.04 64 bit
Guest : Ubuntu 18.04 64 bit
The machine configured has 2 nodes. Each node has 2 CPUs and has been
allocated 3GB of memory. The memory access latencies and bandwidths
for a local access (i.e from initiator 0 to target 0, and from
initiator 1 to target 1) are set as 40ns and 10GB/s respectively. The
memory access latencies and bandwidths for a remote access (i.e from
initiator 1 to target 0, and from initiator 0 to target 1) are set as
80ns and 5GB/s respectively.
The command line launch is as follows.
sudo x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \
-machine hmat=on \
-boot c \
-enable-kvm \
-m 6G,slots=2,maxmem=7G \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=3G,id=m0 \
-object memory-backend-ram,size=3G,id=m1 \
-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=m0 \
-numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=m1 \
-smp 4,sockets=4,maxcpus=4 \
-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=0 \
-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1 \
-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=2 \
-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=3 \
-numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=20 \
-net nic \
-net user \
-hda testing.img \
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=40
\
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=10G
\
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=80
\
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=5G
\
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=80
\
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=5G
\
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=40
\
-numa
hmat-lb,initiator=1,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=10G
\
Then the latencies and bandwidths between the nodes were tested using
the Intel Memory Latency Checker v3.9
(https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/intelr-
memory-latency-checker.html). But the obtained results did not match
the configuration. The following are the results obtained.
Latency_matrix with idle latencies (in ns)
Numa Node
. .0. . .1.
0 36.2 36.4
1 34.9 35.4
Bandwidth_matrix with memory bandwidths (in MB/s)
Numa Node
. . .0. . . .1.
0 15167.1 15308.9
1 15226.0 15234.0
A test was also conducted with the tool “lat_mem_rd” from lmbench to
measure the memory read latencies. This also gave results which did
not match the config.
Any information on why the config latency and bandwidth values are not
applied, would be appreciated.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1888923/+subscriptions