[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] qapi: enable use of g_autoptr with QAPI types
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] qapi: enable use of g_autoptr with QAPI types |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:50:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 06:49:44AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 7/23/20 6:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> > Currently QAPI generates a type and function for free'ing it:
>> >
>> > typedef struct QCryptoBlockCreateOptions QCryptoBlockCreateOptions;
>> > void qapi_free_QCryptoBlockCreateOptions(QCryptoBlockCreateOptions
>> > *obj);
>> >
>>
>> > The above code example now becomes
>> >
>> > g_autoptr(QCryptoBlockCreateOptions) opts = NULL;
>> >
>> > opts = g_new0(QCryptoBlockCreateOptions, 1);
>> >
>> > ....do stuff with opts...
>> >
>> > Note, if the local pointer needs to live beyond the scope holding the
>> > variable, then g_steal_pointer can be used. This is useful to return the
>> > pointer to the caller in the success codepath, while letting it be freed
>> > in all error codepaths.
>> >
>> > return g_steal_pointer(&opts);
>> >
>>
>> Yep, the idea makes sense!
Agree.
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/crypto/block.h | 2 --
>> > scripts/qapi/types.py | 1 +
>> > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Missing a counterpart change to docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt.
Yes. Can do that in my tree.
>> And it might
>> be nice to make this a series with at least one followup patch using the new
>> capability, or at least so 'make check' coverage. But otherwise on the
>> right track.
>
> The crypto/block.c already makes use of this capability, which is why
> I had to remove the line from block.h to avoid declaring the same thing
> twice !
Could be mentioned in the commit message.
Still, using it somewhere in tests would be nice.
test-qobject-input-visitor.c's test_visitor_in_struct_nested() looks
trivial to convert. Feel free to pick something else.
In case you prefer not to, with a qapi-code-gen.txt update:
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>