[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v2 2/2] linux-user, ppc: fix clock_nanosleep() for linux-user-ppc
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
[PATCH v2 2/2] linux-user, ppc: fix clock_nanosleep() for linux-user-ppc |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:46:12 +0200 |
Our safe_clock_nanosleep() returns -1 and updates errno.
We don't need to update the CRF bit in syscall.c because it will
be updated in ppc/cpu_loop.c as the return value is negative.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
---
Notes:
v2: new patch, remove the PPC part as ret is < 0,
CRF will be updated in cpu_loop.c
linux-user/syscall.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index 43a6e283961b..f5c4f6b95db4 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -11840,13 +11840,6 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(void *cpu_env, int num,
abi_long arg1,
host_to_target_timespec(arg4, &ts);
}
-#if defined(TARGET_PPC)
- /* clock_nanosleep is odd in that it returns positive errno values.
- * On PPC, CR0 bit 3 should be set in such a situation. */
- if (ret && ret != -TARGET_ERESTARTSYS) {
- ((CPUPPCState *)cpu_env)->crf[0] |= 1;
- }
-#endif
return ret;
}
#endif
--
2.26.2