qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RFC PATCH-for-5.1? v3 1/2] memory: Allow monkey-patching MemoryRegion a


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: [RFC PATCH-for-5.1? v3 1/2] memory: Allow monkey-patching MemoryRegion access sizes
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:31:53 +0200

To fixes CVE-2020-13754, commit 5d971f9e67 refuses mismatching
sizes in memory_region_access_valid(). This gives troubles when
a device is on an ISA bus, because the CPU is free to use
8/16-bit accesses on the bus (or up to 32-bit on EISA bus),
regardless what range is valid for the device.

To allow surgical change for the 5.1 release, allow monkey
patching of the MemoryRegionOps (by making the MemoryRegion
field not const). This should be reverted after the release
and fixed in a more elegant manner.

Fixes: 5d971f9e67 ('memory: Revert "accept mismatching sizes in 
memory_region_access_valid"')
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
---
 include/exec/memory.h |  7 ++++++-
 softmmu/memory.c      | 12 ++++++++----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
index 307e527835..22028af6b9 100644
--- a/include/exec/memory.h
+++ b/include/exec/memory.h
@@ -383,7 +383,12 @@ struct MemoryRegion {
     RAMBlock *ram_block;
     Object *owner;
 
-    const MemoryRegionOps *ops;
+    /*
+     * XXX this must be 'const' but to counter side effects of
+     * CVE-2020-13754, make it non-const to allow monkey patching
+     * the access sizes. Only allowed for QEMU release v5.1 :(
+     */
+    MemoryRegionOps *ops;
     void *opaque;
     MemoryRegion *container;
     Int128 size;
diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c
index 9200b20130..84b5c617e2 100644
--- a/softmmu/memory.c
+++ b/softmmu/memory.c
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void memory_region_initfn(Object *obj)
     MemoryRegion *mr = MEMORY_REGION(obj);
     ObjectProperty *op;
 
-    mr->ops = &unassigned_mem_ops;
+    mr->ops = g_memdup(&unassigned_mem_ops, sizeof(MemoryRegionOps));
     mr->enabled = true;
     mr->romd_mode = true;
     mr->global_locking = true;
@@ -1485,7 +1485,11 @@ void memory_region_init_io(MemoryRegion *mr,
                            uint64_t size)
 {
     memory_region_init(mr, owner, name, size);
-    mr->ops = ops ? ops : &unassigned_mem_ops;
+    if (ops) {
+        mr->ops = g_memdup(ops, sizeof(MemoryRegionOps));
+    } else {
+        mr->ops = g_memdup(&unassigned_mem_ops, sizeof(MemoryRegionOps));
+    }
     mr->opaque = opaque;
     mr->terminates = true;
 }
@@ -1622,7 +1626,7 @@ void memory_region_init_ram_device_ptr(MemoryRegion *mr,
     mr->ram = true;
     mr->terminates = true;
     mr->ram_device = true;
-    mr->ops = &ram_device_mem_ops;
+    mr->ops = g_memdup(&ram_device_mem_ops, sizeof(MemoryRegionOps));
     mr->opaque = mr;
     mr->destructor = memory_region_destructor_ram;
     mr->dirty_log_mask = tcg_enabled() ? (1 << DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE) : 0;
@@ -1664,7 +1668,7 @@ void memory_region_init_rom_device_nomigrate(MemoryRegion 
*mr,
     Error *err = NULL;
     assert(ops);
     memory_region_init(mr, owner, name, size);
-    mr->ops = ops;
+    mr->ops = g_memdup(ops, sizeof(MemoryRegionOps));
     mr->opaque = opaque;
     mr->terminates = true;
     mr->rom_device = true;
-- 
2.21.3




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]