Re: [PATCH 1/2] python/qemu: Cleanup changes to ConsoleSocket

[Alex Bennée]

Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org> writes:

> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 07:07, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > The changes to console_socket.py and machine.py are to
>> > cleanup for pylint and flake8.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Robert Foley <robert.foley@linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> >  python/qemu/console_socket.py | 58 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>> >  python/qemu/machine.py        |  7 +++--
>> >  python/qemu/pylintrc          |  2 +-
>> >  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/python/qemu/console_socket.py b/python/qemu/console_socket.py
>> > index 830cb7c628..6a746c1dbf 100644
>> > --- a/python/qemu/console_socket.py
>> > +++ b/python/qemu/console_socket.py
>> > @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
>> <snip>
>> > @@ -103,7 +104,6 @@ class ConsoleSocket(asyncore.dispatcher):
>> >
>> >      def set_blocking(self):
>> >          """Maintain compatibility with socket API"""
>> > -        pass
>>
>> Hmm shouldn't this be with the change in 2/2 because I thought you
>> needed a "pass" for an empty function in python?
>
> Thanks for the review !
>
> Sure, I can move this change to 2/2.  Probably makes more sense there
> since we're changing this function there too.
>
> This change was one of the suggestions from John Snow.
> He pointed out that the pass is not needed here since the docstring takes
> the role of the function body.

Ahh I did not know you could do that... I'll defer to John's superior
python knowledge.

>
> Thanks & Regards,
> -Rob
>
>>
>> Otherwise:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Bennée


-- 
Alex Bennée