qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Allow acpi-tmr size=2


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow acpi-tmr size=2
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:55:44 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

+Peter/Paolo

On 7/13/20 1:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:20:12AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 12.07.2020 15:00, Simon John wrote:
>>> macos guests no longer boot after commit 
>>> 5d971f9e672507210e77d020d89e0e89165c8fc9
>>>
>>> acpi-tmr needs 2 byte memory accesses, so breaks as that commit only allows 
>>> 4 bytes.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5d971f9e672507210e7 (memory: Revert "memory: accept mismatching 
>>> sizes in memory_region_access_valid")
>>> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1886318
>>
>> Actually this fixes 77d58b1e47c8d1c661f98f12b47ab519d3561488
>> Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>> Date:   Thu Nov 22 12:12:30 2012 +0100
>> Subject: apci: switch timer to memory api
>> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>>
>> because this is the commit which put min_access_size = 4 in there
>> (5d971f9e672507210e7 is just a messenger, actual error were here
>> earlier but it went unnoticed).
>>
>> While min_access_size=4 was most likely an error, I wonder why
>> we use 1 now, while the subject says it needs 2? What real min
>> size is here for ACPI PM timer?
>>
>> /mjt
> 
> 
> Well the ACPI spec 1.0b says
> 
> 4.7.3.3 Power Management Timer (PM_TMR)
> 
> ...
> 
> This register is accessed as 32 bits.
> 
> and this text is still there in 6.2.
> 
> 
> So it's probably worth it to cite this in the commit log
> and explain it's a spec violation.
> I think it's better to be restrictive and only allow the
> minimal variation from spec - in this case I guess this means 2 byte
> reads.

Now reading this thread, I guess understand this register is
accessed via the I/O address space, where 8/16/32-bit accesses
are always valid if the CPU supports an I/O bus.

We have 3 different devices providing this register:
- ICH9
- PIIX4 (abused in PIIX3)
- VT82C686

All are PCI devices, exposing this register via an ISA function.

The ISA MemoryRegion should allow 8/16/32-bit accesses.

For these devices we use:

MemoryRegion *pci_address_space_io(PCIDevice *dev)
{
    return pci_get_bus(dev)->address_space_io;
}

Which comes from:

static void pci_root_bus_init(PCIBus *bus, DeviceState *parent,
                              MemoryRegion *address_space_mem,
                              MemoryRegion *address_space_io,
                              uint8_t devfn_min)
{
    ...
    bus->address_space_mem = address_space_mem;
    bus->address_space_io = address_space_io;
    ...


In i440fx_init():

    b = pci_root_bus_new(dev, NULL, pci_address_space,
                         address_space_io, 0, TYPE_PCI_BUS);

q35_host_initfn() uses get_system_io() from pc_q35_init().

If the guest did a 16-bit read, it should work ...:

uint16_t cpu_inw(uint32_t addr)
{
    uint8_t buf[2];
    uint16_t val;

    address_space_read(&address_space_io, addr, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
buf, 2);
    val = lduw_p(buf);
    trace_cpu_in(addr, 'w', val);
    return val;
}

... but it is indeed prevented by min_access_size=4.

Maybe we should have the ISA MemoryRegion accepts min_access_size=1
and adjust the access sizes.

> 
> In any case pls do include an explanation for why you picked
> one over the other.
> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon John <git@the-jedi.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>>  hw/acpi/core.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/acpi/core.c b/hw/acpi/core.c
>>> index f6d9ec4f13..05ff29b9d7 100644
>>> --- a/hw/acpi/core.c
>>> +++ b/hw/acpi/core.c
>>> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static void acpi_pm_tmr_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
>>> addr, uint64_t val,
>>>  static const MemoryRegionOps acpi_pm_tmr_ops = {
>>>      .read = acpi_pm_tmr_read,
>>>      .write = acpi_pm_tmr_write,
>>> -    .valid.min_access_size = 4,
>>> +    .valid.min_access_size = 1,
>>>      .valid.max_access_size = 4,
>>>      .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
>>>  };
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]