[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260
From: |
Heiko Carstens |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260 |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:18:16 +0200 |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:12:33PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Note: Reading about diag260 subcode 0xc, we could modify Linux to query
> > the maximum possible pfn via diag260 0xc. Then, we maybe could avoid
> > indicating maxram size via SCLP, and keep diag260-unaware OSs keep
> > working as before. Thoughts?
>
> Implemented it, seems to work fine.
The returned value would not include standby/reserved memory within
z/VM. So this seems not to work.
Also: why do you want to change this?
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, Christian Borntraeger, 2020/07/09
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/09
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/10
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/10
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260,
Heiko Carstens <=
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/10
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, Heiko Carstens, 2020/07/10
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/10
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, Heiko Carstens, 2020/07/13
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/13
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, Christian Borntraeger, 2020/07/13
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/15
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, Heiko Carstens, 2020/07/15
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, David Hildenbrand, 2020/07/15
Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] s390x: implement diag260, Heiko Carstens, 2020/07/15