[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for h
From: |
Eduardo Habkost |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jul 2020 15:13:07 -0400 |
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:00:59AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 2:44 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > (2) GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR
> >
> > Mostly fine. Some edge cases, like different page fault errors for
> > addresses above GUEST_MAXPHYADDR and below HOST_MAXPHYADDR. Which I
> > think Mohammed fixed in the kernel recently.
>
> Doesn't this require intercepting MOV-to-CR3 when the guest is in PAE
> mode, so that the hypervisor can validate the high bits in the PDPTEs?
If the fix has additional overhead, is the additional overhead
bad enough to warrant making it optional? Most existing
GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR guests already work today
without the fix.
--
Eduardo
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/07/08
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/07/08
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Gerd Hoffmann, 2020/07/09
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Jim Mattson, 2020/07/09
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it,
Eduardo Habkost <=
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/07/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/07/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/07/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/cpu: Handle GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR for hosts that don't support it, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/07/10