qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] coverity: provide Coverity-friendly MIN_CONST and MAX_CON


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coverity: provide Coverity-friendly MIN_CONST and MAX_CONST
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:01:39 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 6/29/20 6:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Coverity has problems seeing through __builtin_choose_expr, which
> result in it abandoning analysis of later functions that utilize a
> definition that used MIN_CONST or MAX_CONST, such as in qemu-file.c:
> 
>  50    DECLARE_BITMAP(may_free, MAX_IOV_SIZE);
> 
> CID 1429992 (#1 of 1): Unrecoverable parse warning (PARSE_ERROR)1.
> expr_not_constant: expression must have a constant value
> 
> As has been done in the past (see 07d66672), it's okay to dumb things
> down when compiling for static analyzers.  (Of course, now the
> syntax-checker has a false positive on our reference to
> __COVERITY__...)
> 
> Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Fixes: CID 1429992, CID 1429995, CID 1429997, CID 1429999
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

> ---
> 
> Improvements over Paolo's v1:
> - proper use of ()
> - add comment explaining the COVERITY section
> - add indentation for easier read of #if/#else flow
> 
>  include/qemu/osdep.h | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/qemu/osdep.h b/include/qemu/osdep.h
> index 0d26a1b9bd07..0fc206ae6154 100644
> --- a/include/qemu/osdep.h
> +++ b/include/qemu/osdep.h
> @@ -250,7 +250,8 @@ extern int daemon(int, int);
>   * Note that neither form is usable as an #if condition; if you truly
>   * need to write conditional code that depends on a minimum or maximum
>   * determined by the pre-processor instead of the compiler, you'll
> - * have to open-code it.
> + * have to open-code it.  Sadly, Coverity is severely confused by the
> + * constant variants, so we have to dumb things down there.
>   */
>  #undef MIN
>  #define MIN(a, b)                                       \
> @@ -258,22 +259,28 @@ extern int daemon(int, int);
>          typeof(1 ? (a) : (b)) _a = (a), _b = (b);       \
>          _a < _b ? _a : _b;                              \
>      })
> -#define MIN_CONST(a, b)                                         \
> -    __builtin_choose_expr(                                      \
> -        __builtin_constant_p(a) && __builtin_constant_p(b),     \
> -        (a) < (b) ? (a) : (b),                                  \
> -        ((void)0))
>  #undef MAX
>  #define MAX(a, b)                                       \
>      ({                                                  \
>          typeof(1 ? (a) : (b)) _a = (a), _b = (b);       \
>          _a > _b ? _a : _b;                              \
>      })
> -#define MAX_CONST(a, b)                                         \
> +
> +#ifdef __COVERITY__
> +# define MIN_CONST(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
> +# define MAX_CONST(a, b) ((a) > (b) ? (a) : (b))
> +#else
> +# define MIN_CONST(a, b)                                        \
> +    __builtin_choose_expr(                                      \
> +        __builtin_constant_p(a) && __builtin_constant_p(b),     \
> +        (a) < (b) ? (a) : (b),                                  \
> +        ((void)0))
> +# define MAX_CONST(a, b)                                        \
>      __builtin_choose_expr(                                      \
>          __builtin_constant_p(a) && __builtin_constant_p(b),     \
>          (a) > (b) ? (a) : (b),                                  \
>          ((void)0))
> +#endif
> 
>  /*
>   * Minimum function that returns zero only if both values are zero.
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]