qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [REPORT] [GSoC - TCG Continuous Benchmarking] [#1] Measuring Basic P


From: Aleksandar Markovic
Subject: Re: [REPORT] [GSoC - TCG Continuous Benchmarking] [#1] Measuring Basic Performance Metrics of QEMU
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:37:54 +0200

пон, 22. јун 2020. у 12:31 Ahmed Karaman
<ahmedkhaledkaraman@gmail.com> је написао/ла:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Welcome to the TCG Continuous Benchmarking GSoC project!
> This is the first report in a series that will be posted here on the
> mailing list as part of the project.
>
> During the project, multiple Linux profiling tools will be used.
> These tools will help you profile your different QEMU execution
> scenarios, and locate performance bottlenecks as well as performance
> regression problems.
>
> To provide you with a better understanding of these tools, this report
> presents two of them - Perf and Callgrind.
> It starts with measuring the basic performance metrics when running
> a program using both tools, then it proceeds to calculating the top 25
> most executed functions in QEMU.
> To dissect the output of each of the two tools, a separate section
> for comparing the output results is presented which focuses on how
> these results apply to QEMU.
> Finally, a stability test is devised that compares how the output
> of the two tools differ with each subsequent invocation of QEMU.
>
> For easier accessibility, all reports will be hosted on a dedicated
> website:
> https://ahmedkrmn.github.io/TCG-Continuous-Benchmarking/
>
> Link to the first report:
> https://ahmedkrmn.github.io/TCG-Continuous-Benchmarking/Measuring-Basic-Performance-Metrics-of-QEMU/
>

In introductory section on Callgrind, maybe you could add the general
form of command line that performs profiling using Callgrind,
something like this:

valgrind --tool=callgrind [callgrind options] prog [prog options]

Not a big deal, you can do some fine adjustments throughout the project.

Thanks,
Aleksandar

> Best regards,
> Ahmed Karaman



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]