Re: [PATCH v2] configure: prefer sphinx-build to sphinx-build-3

[John Snow]

On 5/14/20 6:40 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 22:52, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> +# We require the python3 version of sphinx, but sphinx-build-3 is a
>> +# distro package. prefer 'sphinx-build' to find the venv version, if
>> +# any, but ensure it is a suitable version.
>>  sphinx_build=
>> -for binary in sphinx-build-3 sphinx-build
>> +sphinx_ok=
>> +for binary in sphinx-build sphinx-build-3
>>  do
>>      if has "$binary"
>>      then
>> -        sphinx_build=$(command -v "$binary")
>> -        break
>> +        sphinx_candidate=$(command -v "$binary")
>> +        if test_sphinx_build "$sphinx_candidate"
>> +        then
>> +            sphinx_build=$sphinx_candidate
>> +            sphinx_ok=yes
>> +            break
>> +        fi
>>      fi
>>  done
> 
> Here we look for a sphinx binary that works, and if
> we find one then we set sphinx_build to that binary and
> set sphinx_ok to 'yes'.
> 
> But then (in the part of configure between these two patch hunks)
> if the user uses the command line --sphinx-build=foo option we
> will reset sphinx_build but don't reset sphinx_ok...
> 
>>  # Check if tools are available to build documentation.
>>  if test "$docs" != "no" ; then
>> -  if has_sphinx_build; then
>> -    sphinx_ok=yes
>> -  else
>> -    sphinx_ok=no
>> +
>> +  if [ "$sphinx_ok" != "yes" ]; then
>> +    if test_sphinx_build "$sphinx_build"; then
>> +      sphinx_ok=yes
>> +    else
>> +      sphinx_ok=no
>> +    fi
>>    fi
> 
> ...which means we'll skip this check entirely and won't
> test to see whether the user-specified sphinx-build binary works.
> 
>> +
>>    if has makeinfo && has pod2man && test "$sphinx_ok" = "yes"; then
>>      docs=yes
>>    else
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

Oops!

I've tried a new method of invoking sphinx instead of pursuing this, but
I see it has a build failure for one of our CI tests, so I'll keep
poking at it.

--js