qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] acpi: Enable TPM IRQ


From: Auger Eric
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] acpi: Enable TPM IRQ
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:36:59 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0

Hi Stefan,

On 6/16/20 4:05 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 6/16/20 9:01 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On 6/15/20 7:11 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>> On 6/15/20 11:13 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/tpm.h b/include/hw/acpi/tpm.h
>>>>> index 1a2a57a21f..063a9eb42a 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/hw/acpi/tpm.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/tpm.h
>>>>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>>>>>    #define TPM_TIS_ADDR_BASE           0xFED40000
>>>>>    #define TPM_TIS_ADDR_SIZE           0x5000
>>>>>
>>>>> -#define TPM_TIS_IRQ                 5
>>>>> +#define TPM_TIS_IRQ                 13
>>>
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>>   does this change have any negative side effects on ARM? If you prefer,
>>> we can split this part here up into TPM_TIS_ISA_IRQ and TPM_TIS_SYSBUS
>>> IRQ and leave the latter at '5' because we know that this is working.
>> The IRQ is not advertised in dt nor ACPI on ARM. However it is
>> advertised in the capability reg and in the vector. reg So I think this
>> should be fixed? I guess on ARM we will pick up a completely different
>> IRQ num, allocated from the platform bus slot.
> 
> 
> The specification
> 
> https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/PC-Client-Specific-Platform-TPM-Profile-for-TPM-2p0-v1p04_r0p37_pub-1.pdf
> 
> 
> declares several fields in the Interface Capability Register (table 23,
> pdf page 89) to be mandatory and they must be set to '1'. So I would not
> want to touch those. We can set the interrupt vector register to '0' in
> case interrupts are not supported. Following the spec 0 means that no
> interrupts are supported. I will now split TPM_TIS_IRQ into
> TPM_TIS_ISA_IRQ and TPM_TIS_SYSBUS_IRQ and will in the end set
> TPM_TIS_SYSBUS_IRQ to 'disabled', indicating that IRQs are not
> supported, though they should work even though on ARM there may not be a
> driver to test this with. Does this sound ok?

Yes it does.

Thanks

Eric
> 
> 
>    Stefan
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>>     Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>>>    #define TPM_TIS_NUM_LOCALITIES      5     /* per spec */
>>>>>    #define TPM_TIS_LOCALITY_SHIFT      12
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.24.1
>>>>>
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]