qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] tpm_tis: Allow lowering of IRQ also when locality is


From: Stefan Berger
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] tpm_tis: Allow lowering of IRQ also when locality is not active
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:35:03 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1

On 6/15/20 11:06 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:23 PM Stefan Berger
<stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>

This patch fixes a bug that occurs when using interrupts. It
allows to lower the IRQ also when a locality is not active.

Can you quote the specification, or is it purely based on testing
(Windows & Linux) or checking expected behaviour from Linux code?

There's no spec for this detail. It's purely based on testing.

also: Linux 5.x had interrupt support for a short while but this was removed due to some laptops receiving an interrupt storm following enablement: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg11870.html  [ reason seems to be misconfiguration of some GPIO pin]

I tested it with this patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/20/421

5.4 kernel: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.4/source/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c#L983


   Stefan





Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
---
  hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c | 4 ----
  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c
index 1af4bce139..0f42696f1f 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c
+++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_tis_common.c
@@ -601,10 +601,6 @@ static void tpm_tis_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
          /* hard wired -- ignore */
          break;
      case TPM_TIS_REG_INT_STATUS:
-        if (s->active_locty != locty) {
-            break;
-        }
-
          /* clearing of interrupt flags */
          if (((val & TPM_TIS_INTERRUPTS_SUPPORTED)) &&
              (s->loc[locty].ints & TPM_TIS_INTERRUPTS_SUPPORTED)) {
--
2.24.1





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]