qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 4/4] check-block: Enable iotests with SafeStack


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] check-block: Enable iotests with SafeStack
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:13:19 +0100

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:35:42AM -0400, Daniele Buono wrote:
> On 5/21/2020 5:59 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:44:20PM -0400, Daniele Buono wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniele Buono <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >   tests/check-block.sh | 12 +++++++++++-
> > >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/check-block.sh b/tests/check-block.sh
> > > index ad320c21ba..8e29c868e5 100755
> > > --- a/tests/check-block.sh
> > > +++ b/tests/check-block.sh
> > > @@ -21,7 +21,17 @@ if grep -q "CONFIG_GPROF=y" config-host.mak 
> > > 2>/dev/null ; then
> > >       exit 0
> > >   fi
> > > -if grep -q "CFLAGS.*-fsanitize" config-host.mak 2>/dev/null ; then
> > > +# Disable tests with any sanitizer except for SafeStack
> > > +CFLAGS=$( grep "CFLAGS.*-fsanitize" config-host.mak 2>/dev/null )
> > > +SANITIZE_FLAGS=""
> > > +#Remove all occurrencies of -fsanitize=safe-stack
> > > +for i in ${CFLAGS}; do
> > > +        if [ "${i}" != "-fsanitize=safe-stack" ]; then
> > > +                SANITIZE_FLAGS="${SANITIZE_FLAGS} ${i}"
> > > +        fi
> > > +done
> > > +if echo ${SANITIZE_FLAGS} | grep -q "\-fsanitize" 2>/dev/null; then
> > > +    # Have a sanitize flag that is not allowed, stop
> > >       echo "Sanitizers are enabled ==> Not running the qemu-iotests."
> > >       exit 0
> > >   fi
> > 
> > The commit that disabled check-block.sh with sanitizers said:
> > 
> >    The sanitizers (especially the address sanitizer from Clang) are
> >    sometimes printing out warnings or false positives - this spoils
> >    the output of the iotests, causing some of the tests to fail.
> > 
> > It seems fine to allow SafeStack if check-block.sh currently passes with
> > it enabled. Does it pass and produce no extra output?
> > 
> Yes, that was the idea. SafeStack should pass the tests without extra
> output.
> 
> It did (pass) on my testing machine. However I don't remember if I did the
> full (slow) check or only the partial one.
> 
> Will check again before I submit v2

Great, thanks!

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]