[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2020 05:59:07 -0400 |
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:54:57PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:34:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2020/5/13 下午5:47, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > >>> case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
> > >>> /* a close event may happen during a read/write, but vhost
> > >>> * code assumes the vhost_dev remains setup, so delay the
> > >>> * stop & clear to idle.
> > >>> * FIXME: better handle failure in vhost code, remove bh
> > >>> */
> > >>> if (s->watch) {
> > >>> AioContext *ctx = qemu_get_current_aio_context();
> > >>>
> > >>> g_source_remove(s->watch);
> > >>> s->watch = 0;
> > >>> qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> > >>> NULL, NULL, false);
> > >>>
> > >>> aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(ctx, chr_closed_bh, opaque);
> > >>> }
> > >>> break;
> > >>>
> > >>>I think it's time we dropped the FIXME and moved the handling to common
> > >>>code. Jason? Marc-André?
> > >>I agree. Just to confirm, do you prefer bh or doing changes like what is
> > >>done in this series? It looks to me bh can have more easier codes.
> > >Could it be a good idea just to make disconnect in the char device but
> > >postphone clean up in the vhost-user-blk (or any other vhost-user
> > >device) itself? So we are moving the postphone logic and decision from
> > >the char device to vhost-user device. One of the idea i have is as
> > >follows:
> > > - Put ourself in the INITIALIZATION state
> > > - Start these vhost-user "handshake" commands
> > > - If we got a disconnect error, perform disconnect, but don't clean up
> > > device (it will be clean up on the roll back). I can be done by
> > > checking the state in vhost_user_..._disconnect routine or smth like
> > > it
> >
> >
> > Any issue you saw just using the aio bh as Michael posted above.
> >
> > Then we don't need to deal with the silent vhost_dev_stop() and we will have
> > codes that is much more easier to understand.
> I've implemented this solution inside
> hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c:vhost_user_blk_event() in the similar way by
> using the s->connected field. Looks good and more correct fix ). I have
> two questions here before i'll rework the fixes:
> 1. Is it okay to make the similar fix inside vhost_user_blk_event() or
> we are looking for more generic vhost-user solution? What do you think?
Either works I think.
> 2. For migration we require an additional information that for the
> vhost-user device it isn't an error, because i'm trigerring the
> following assert error:
> Core was generated by `x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -nodefaults
> -no-user-config -M q35,sata=false'.
> Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> #0 0x00007fb56e729428 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7fb486ef5700 (LWP 527734))]
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00007fb56e729428 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> #1 0x00007fb56e72b02a in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> #2 0x00005648ea376ee6 in vhost_log_global_start
> (listener=0x5648ece4eb08) at ./hw/virtio/vhost.c:857
> #3 0x00005648ea2dde7e in memory_global_dirty_log_start ()
> at ./memory.c:2611
> #4 0x00005648ea2e68e7 in ram_init_bitmaps (rs=0x7fb4740008c0)
> at ./migration/ram.c:2305
> #5 0x00005648ea2e698b in ram_init_all (rsp=0x5648eb1f0f20 <ram_state>)
> at ./migration/ram.c:2323
> #6 0x00005648ea2e6cc5 in ram_save_setup (f=0x5648ec609e00,
> opaque=0x5648eb1f0f20 <ram_state>)
> at ./migration/ram.c:2436
> #7 0x00005648ea67b7d3 in qemu_savevm_state_setup (f=0x5648ec609e00) at
> migration/savevm.c:1176
> #8 0x00005648ea674511 in migration_thread (opaque=0x5648ec031ff0) at
> migration/migration.c:3416
> #9 0x00005648ea85d65d in qemu_thread_start (args=0x5648ec6057f0) at
> util/qemu-thread-posix.c:519
> #10 0x00007fb56eac56ba in start_thread () from
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
> #11 0x00007fb56e7fb41d in clone () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> (gdb) frame 2
> #2 0x00005648ea376ee6 in vhost_log_global_start
> (listener=0x5648ece4eb08) at ./hw/virtio/vhost.c:857
> 857 abort();
> (gdb) list
> 852 {
> 853 int r;
> 854
> 855 r = vhost_migration_log(listener, true);
> 856 if (r < 0) {
> 857 abort();
> 858 }
> 859 }
> 860
> 861 static void vhost_log_global_stop(MemoryListener *listener)
> Since bh postphone the clean up, we can't use the ->started field.
> Do we have any mechanism to get the device type/state in the common
> vhost_migration_log() routine? So for example for the vhost-user/disconnect
> device we will be able to return 0. Or should we implement it and introduce
> it in this patch set?
>
> Thanks, Dima.
>
> >
> > Thank
> >
> >
> > > - vhost-user command returns error back to the _start() routine
> > > - Rollback in one place in the start() routine, by calling this
> > > postphoned clean up for the disconnect
> > >
> >
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, Dima Stepanov, 2020/05/18
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, Jason Wang, 2020/05/17
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, Dima Stepanov, 2020/05/18
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2020/05/18
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, Dima Stepanov, 2020/05/19
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2020/05/19
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add device started check in migration set log, Dima Stepanov, 2020/05/19