qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm g


From: Janosch Frank
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 10:55:24 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2

On 5/16/20 12:20 AM, Collin Walling wrote:
> As more features and facilities are added to the Read SCP Info (RSCPI)
> response, more space is required to store them. The space used to store
> these new features intrudes on the space originally used to store CPU
> entries. This means as more features and facilities are added to the
> RSCPI response, less space can be used to store CPU entries.
> 
> With the Extended-Length SCCB (ELS) facility, a KVM guest can execute
> the RSCPI command and determine if the SCCB is large enough to store a
> complete reponse. If it is not large enough, then the required length
> will be set in the SCCB header.
> 
> The caller of the SCLP command is responsible for creating a
> large-enough SCCB to store a complete response. Proper checking should
> be in place, and the caller should execute the command once-more with
> the large-enough SCCB.
> 
> This facility also enables an extended SCCB for the Read CPU Info
> (RCPUI) command.
> 
> When this facility is enabled, the boundary violation response cannot
> be a result from the RSCPI, RSCPI Forced, or RCPUI commands.
> 
> In order to tolerate kernels that do not yet have full support for this
> feature, a "fixed" offset to the start of the CPU Entries within the
> Read SCP Info struct is set to allow for the original 248 max entries
> when this feature is disabled.
> 
> Additionally, this is introduced as a CPU feature to protect the guest
> from migrating to a machine that does not support storing an extended
> SCCB. This could otherwise hinder the VM from being able to read all
> available CPU entries after migration (such as during re-ipl).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/sclp.c                     | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/hw/s390x/sclp.h             |  1 +
>  target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h |  1 +
>  target/s390x/gen-features.c         |  1 +
>  target/s390x/kvm.c                  |  4 ++++
>  5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> index 755f5f3fab..bde4c5420e 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,18 @@ static bool sccb_has_valid_boundary(uint64_t sccb_addr, 
> uint32_t code,
>      uint64_t allowed_len = (sccb_addr & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE;
>  
>      switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) {
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO:
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED:
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO:
> +        /*
> +         * An extended-length SCCB is only allowed for RSCPI and RSCPU and is
> +         * allowed to exceed the 4k boundary. The respective commands will
> +         * set the length field to the required length if an insufficient
> +         * SCCB length is provided.
> +         */
> +        if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB)) {
> +            return true;
> +        }
>      default:
>          if (current_len <= allowed_len) {
>              return true;
> @@ -72,6 +84,10 @@ static bool sccb_has_sufficient_len(SCCB *sccb, int 
> num_cpus, int data_len)
>  
>      if (be16_to_cpu(sccb->h.length) < required_len) {
>          sccb->h.response_code = 
> cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INSUFFICIENT_SCCB_LENGTH);
> +        if (s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB) &&
> +            sccb->h.control_mask[2] & SCLP_VARIABLE_LENGTH_RESPONSE) {
> +            sccb->h.length = required_len;
> +        }
>          return false;
>      }
>      return true;
> @@ -101,7 +117,9 @@ static void prepare_cpu_entries(MachineState *ms, 
> CPUEntry *entry, int *count)
>   */
>  static int get_read_scp_info_data_len(void)
>  {
> -    return offsetof(ReadInfo, entries);
> +    return s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB) ?
> +           offsetof(ReadInfo, entries) :
> +           SCLP_READ_SCP_INFO_FIXED_CPU_OFFSET;
>  }
>  
>  /* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */
> @@ -116,6 +134,7 @@ static void read_SCP_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
>      CPUEntry *entries_start = (void *)sccb + data_len;
>  
>      if (!sccb_has_sufficient_len(sccb, machine->possible_cpus->len, 
> data_len)) {
> +        warn_report("insufficient sccb size to store full read scp info 
> response");
>          return;
>      }
>  
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> index 822eff4396..ef2d63eae9 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ typedef struct CPUEntry {
>      uint8_t reserved1;
>  } QEMU_PACKED CPUEntry;
>  
> +#define SCLP_READ_SCP_INFO_FIXED_CPU_OFFSET     128
>  typedef struct ReadInfo {
>      SCCBHeader h;
>      uint16_t rnmax;
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h 
> b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> index 60db28351d..3548d65a69 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ DEF_FEAT(GUARDED_STORAGE, "gs", STFL, 133, "Guarded-storage 
> facility")
>  DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_PACKED_DECIMAL, "vxpd", STFL, 134, "Vector packed decimal 
> facility")
>  DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_ENH, "vxeh", STFL, 135, "Vector enhancements facility")
>  DEF_FEAT(MULTIPLE_EPOCH, "mepoch", STFL, 139, "Multiple-epoch facility")
> +DEF_FEAT(EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, "els", STFL, 140, "Extended-length SCCB 
> facility")
>  DEF_FEAT(TEST_PENDING_EXT_INTERRUPTION, "tpei", STFL, 144, 
> "Test-pending-external-interruption facility")
>  DEF_FEAT(INSERT_REFERENCE_BITS_MULT, "irbm", STFL, 145, 
> "Insert-reference-bits-multiple facility")
>  DEF_FEAT(MSA_EXT_8, "msa8-base", STFL, 146, 
> "Message-security-assist-extension-8 facility (excluding subfunctions)")
> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> index 8ddeebc544..6857f657fb 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> @@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA1[] = {
>      S390_FEAT_AP_QUEUE_INTERRUPT_CONTROL,
>      S390_FEAT_AP_FACILITIES_TEST,
>      S390_FEAT_AP,
> +    S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB,
>  };
>  
>  static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA2[] = {
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index 69881a0da0..380fb81822 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -2456,6 +2456,10 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, 
> Error **errp)
>          KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO_ENABLE_APIE)) {
>          set_bit(S390_FEAT_AP, model->features);
>      }
> +
> +    /* Extended-Length SCCB is handled entirely within QEMU */
> +    set_bit(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, model->features);
> +

We need to fence this for secure guests as the SIDA is only 4k at the
moment.

Do we need to take extra steps for migration safety?
I guess this is only available with host-passthrough or -model?

>      /* strip of features that are not part of the maximum model */
>      bitmap_and(model->features, model->features, model->def->full_feat,
>                 S390_FEAT_MAX);
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]