qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH Kernel v18 5/7] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dir


From: Alex Williamson
Subject: Re: [PATCH Kernel v18 5/7] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 16:25:11 -0600

On Mon, 4 May 2020 21:28:57 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden> wrote:

> DMA mapped pages, including those pinned by mdev vendor drivers, might
> get unpinned and unmapped while migration is active and device is still
> running. For example, in pre-copy phase while guest driver could access
> those pages, host device or vendor driver can dirty these mapped pages.
> Such pages should be marked dirty so as to maintain memory consistency
> for a user making use of dirty page tracking.
> 
> To get bitmap during unmap, user should allocate memory for bitmap, set
> size of allocated memory, set page size to be considered for bitmap and
> set flag VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <address@hidden>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 84 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       | 10 +++++
>  2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 01dcb417836f..8b27faf1ec38 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -983,12 +983,14 @@ static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t 
> bitmap_size)
>  }
>  
>  static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> -                          struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
> +                          struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap,
> +                          struct vfio_bitmap *bitmap)
>  {
>       uint64_t mask;
>       struct vfio_dma *dma, *dma_last = NULL;
>       size_t unmapped = 0;
>       int ret = 0, retries = 0;
> +     unsigned long *final_bitmap = NULL, *temp_bitmap = NULL;
>  
>       mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu))) - 1;
>  
> @@ -1041,6 +1043,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>                       ret = -EINVAL;
>                       goto unlock;
>               }
> +
>               dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0);
>               if (dma && dma->iova + dma->size != unmap->iova + unmap->size) {
>                       ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -1048,6 +1051,22 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +          iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {

Why do we even accept VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP when not
dirty page tracking rather than returning -EINVAL?  It would simplify
things here to reject it at the ioctl and silently ignoring a flag is
rarely if ever the right approach.

> +             final_bitmap = kvzalloc(bitmap->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!final_bitmap) {
> +                     ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                     goto unlock;
> +             }
> +
> +             temp_bitmap = kvzalloc(bitmap->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!temp_bitmap) {
> +                     ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                     kfree(final_bitmap);
> +                     goto unlock;
> +             }

YIKES!  So the user can instantly trigger the kernel to internally
allocate 2 x 256MB, regardless of how much they can actually map.

> +     }
> +
>       while ((dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, unmap->size))) {
>               if (!iommu->v2 && unmap->iova > dma->iova)
>                       break;
> @@ -1058,6 +1077,24 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>               if (dma->task->mm != current->mm)
>                       break;
>  
> +             if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +                  iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> +                     unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(bitmap->pgsize);
> +                     unsigned int npages = dma->size >> pgshift;
> +                     unsigned int shift;
> +
> +                     vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap(iommu, dma->iova, dma->size,
> +                                     bitmap->pgsize, (u64 *)temp_bitmap);

vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap() takes a __user bitmap, we're doing
copy_to_user() on a kernel allocated buffer???

> +
> +                     shift = (dma->iova - unmap->iova) >> pgshift;
> +                     if (shift)
> +                             bitmap_shift_left(temp_bitmap, temp_bitmap,
> +                                               shift, npages);
> +                     bitmap_or(final_bitmap, final_bitmap, temp_bitmap,
> +                               shift + npages);
> +                     memset(temp_bitmap, 0, bitmap->size);
> +             }

It seems like if the per vfio_dma dirty bitmap was oversized by a long
that we could shift it in place, then we'd only need one working bitmap
buffer and we could size that to fit the vfio_dma (or the largest
vfio_dma if we don't want to free and re-alloc for each vfio_dma).
We'd need to do more copy_to/from_user()s, but we'd also avoid copying
between sparse mappings (user zero'd bitmap required) and we'd have a
far more reasonable memory usage.  Thanks,

Alex

> +
>               if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list)) {
>                       struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap nb_unmap;
>  
> @@ -1088,6 +1125,16 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>       }
>  
>  unlock:
> +     if ((unmap->flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) &&
> +          iommu->dirty_page_tracking && final_bitmap) {
> +             if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap->data, final_bitmap,
> +                              bitmap->size))
> +                     ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> +             kfree(final_bitmap);
> +             kfree(temp_bitmap);
> +     }
> +
>       mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>  
>       /* Report how much was unmapped */
> @@ -2419,17 +2466,46 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  
>       } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA) {
>               struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap unmap;
> -             long ret;
> +             struct vfio_bitmap bitmap = { 0 };
> +             int ret;
>  
>               minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap, size);
>  
>               if (copy_from_user(&unmap, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>                       return -EFAULT;
>  
> -             if (unmap.argsz < minsz || unmap.flags)
> +             if (unmap.argsz < minsz ||
> +                 unmap.flags & ~VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP)
>                       return -EINVAL;
>  
> -             ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap);
> +             if (unmap.flags & VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP) {
> +                     unsigned long pgshift;
> +                     size_t iommu_pgsize =
> +                             (size_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> +
> +                     if (unmap.argsz < (minsz + sizeof(bitmap)))
> +                             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +                     if (copy_from_user(&bitmap,
> +                                        (void __user *)(arg + minsz),
> +                                        sizeof(bitmap)))
> +                             return -EFAULT;
> +
> +                     /* allow only min supported pgsize */
> +                     if (bitmap.pgsize != iommu_pgsize)
> +                             return -EINVAL;
> +                     if (!access_ok((void __user *)bitmap.data, bitmap.size))
> +                             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +                     pgshift = __ffs(bitmap.pgsize);
> +                     ret = verify_bitmap_size(unmap.size >> pgshift,
> +                                              bitmap.size);
> +                     if (ret)
> +                             return ret;
> +
> +             }
> +
> +             ret = vfio_dma_do_unmap(iommu, &unmap, &bitmap);
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
>  
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 5f359c63f5ef..e3cbf8b78623 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1048,12 +1048,22 @@ struct vfio_bitmap {
>   * field.  No guarantee is made to the user that arbitrary unmaps of iova
>   * or size different from those used in the original mapping call will
>   * succeed.
> + * VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP should be set to get dirty bitmap
> + * before unmapping IO virtual addresses. When this flag is set, user must
> + * provide data[] as structure vfio_bitmap. User must allocate memory to get
> + * bitmap and must set size of allocated memory in vfio_bitmap.size field.
> + * A bit in bitmap represents one page of user provided page size in 
> 'pgsize',
> + * consecutively starting from iova offset. Bit set indicates page at that
> + * offset from iova is dirty. Bitmap of pages in the range of unmapped size 
> is
> + * returned in vfio_bitmap.data
>   */
>  struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap {
>       __u32   argsz;
>       __u32   flags;
> +#define VFIO_DMA_UNMAP_FLAG_GET_DIRTY_BITMAP (1 << 0)
>       __u64   iova;                           /* IO virtual address */
>       __u64   size;                           /* Size of mapping (bytes) */
> +     __u8    data[];
>  };
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 14)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]