qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] linux-user/strace.list: fix epoll_create{,1} -strace output


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-user/strace.list: fix epoll_create{,1} -strace output
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 17:06:39 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

+ Helge & Aleksandar.

On 5/1/20 12:59 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:59:57 +0100
Sergei Trofimovich <address@hidden> wrote:

Fix syscall name and parameters priinter.

Before the change:

```
$ alpha-linux-user/qemu-alpha -strace -L /usr/alpha-unknown-linux-gnu/ /tmp/a
...
1274697 
%s(%d)(2097152,274903156744,274903156760,274905840712,274877908880,274903235616)
 = 3

Oops...

1274697 exit_group(0)
```

After the change:

```
$ alpha-linux-user/qemu-alpha -strace -L /usr/alpha-unknown-linux-gnu/ /tmp/a
...
1273719 epoll_create1(2097152) = 3
1273719 exit_group(0)
```


Cc: address@hidden
Fixes: 9cbc0578cb6 ("Improve output of various syscalls")

Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <address@hidden>
CC: Riku Voipio <address@hidden>
CC: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
---
  linux-user/strace.list | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-user/strace.list b/linux-user/strace.list
index d49a1e92a8..9281c0a758 100644
--- a/linux-user/strace.list
+++ b/linux-user/strace.list
@@ -125,10 +125,10 @@
  { TARGET_NR_dup3, "dup3" , "%s(%d,%d,%d)", NULL, NULL },
  #endif
  #ifdef TARGET_NR_epoll_create
-{ TARGET_NR_epoll_create, "%s(%d)", NULL, NULL, NULL },
+{ TARGET_NR_epoll_create, "epoll_create", "%s(%d)", NULL, NULL },
  #endif
  #ifdef TARGET_NR_epoll_create1
-{ TARGET_NR_epoll_create1, "%s(%d)", NULL, NULL, NULL },
+{ TARGET_NR_epoll_create1, "epoll_create1", "%s(%d)", NULL, NULL },
  #endif
  #ifdef TARGET_NR_epoll_ctl
  { TARGET_NR_epoll_ctl, "epoll_ctl" , NULL, NULL, NULL },
--
2.26.1


Should it be handled differently?

No, you are correct, we missed this when reviewing commit 9cbc0578cb6.

Thanks for your patch!

Too bad it missed the 5.0 release :/

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]