qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] i386: Hyper-V VMBus ACPI DSDT entry


From: Jon Doron
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] i386: Hyper-V VMBus ACPI DSDT entry
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 18:30:13 +0300

 Thank you Maciej it seems like your version is really ahead I'll do
the required work and merge it so i can submit a v2 with the latest
patchset from Roman

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:06 PM Jon Doron <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Thank you Maciej, I based it on top of what Denis (address@hidden) gave me
> which was this:
> https://ftp.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/openvz-7.0.12-288/source/SRPMS/q/qemu-kvm-vz-2.12.0-33.vz7.14.4.src.rpm
>
> Do you think you have a more recent version I dont mind diffing and
> resubmitting a new version of the patchset?
>
> Thanks,
> -- Jon.
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:56 PM Maciej S. Szmigiero
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > On 03.04.2020 16:23, Jon Doron wrote:
> > > Guest OS uses ACPI to discover vmbus presence.  Add a corresponding
> > > entry to DSDT in case vmbus has been enabled.
> > >
> > > Experimentally Windows guests were found to require this entry to
> > > include two IRQ resources, so this patch adds two semi-arbitrarily
> > > chosen ones (7 and 13).  This results, in particular, in parallel port
> > > conflicting with vmbus.
> > >
> > > TODO: discover and use spare IRQs to avoid conflicts.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Evgeny Yakovlev <address@hidden>
> > > Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <address@hidden>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Doron <address@hidden>
> >
> > Nice work, thanks!
> >
> > However, it seems to be based on the code version that was posted in
> > February 2018, and not the latest version in OpenVZ qemu repository
> > dated October 2019:
> > https://src.openvz.org/projects/UP/repos/qemu/commits?until=refs%2Fheads%2Fvmbus
> >
> > This newer version has slightly different API here and there.
> > Any particular reason for selecting that older version for porting?
> >
> > I have actually rebased this latest version on the top of the current
> > QEMU master, and it basically seems to work fine.
> > However, I haven't done extensive tests whether there isn't a memory leak
> > somewhere or so on.
> >
> > Maciej



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]