Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] block/block-copy: rename start to offset in interfaces

[Max Reitz]

On 10.03.20 15:55, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/03/2020 17:50, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 06.03.20 08:38, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> offset/bytes pair is more usual naming in block layer, let's use it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <address@hidden>
>>> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>   include/block/block-copy.h |  4 +-
>>>   block/block-copy.c         | 84 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
>>> index 4c947e548b..2b29131653 100644
>>> --- a/block/block-copy.c
>>> +++ b/block/block-copy.c
>>> @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@
>>>   #define BLOCK_COPY_MAX_MEM (128 * MiB)
>>>     static BlockCopyInFlightReq
>>> *find_conflicting_inflight_req(BlockCopyState *s,
>>> -                                                           int64_t
>>> start,
>>> -                                                           int64_t
>>> bytes)
>>> +                                                          int64_t
>>> offset,
>>> +                                                          int64_t
>>> bytes)
>>
>> The alignment’s off now.
>>
>> Max
>>
> 
> After applying the patch, it looks aligned in my vim editor.

I did apply it and it wasn’t aligned for me.

Now we (Red Hat) have some mailing agent for a couple of months now that
for some reason likes to change incoming mails’ encodings (in this case
from, I presume, 8bit to quoted-printable), so I have to use a script to
translate it back.  But judging from what I can see in the archive:

https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2020-03/msg00196.html

the alignment is indeed off.  Otherwise, the second line (with the
@bytes parameter) would not be changed.

Max

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature