qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] softmmu/vl.c: fix too slow TCG regression


From: Niek Linnenbank
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softmmu/vl.c: fix too slow TCG regression
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:51:22 +0100

Hello Igor, Alex,

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:21 PM Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:

Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> writes:

> Commit a1b18df9a4 moved -m option parsing after configure_accelerators()
> that broke TCG accelerator initialization which accesses global ram_size
> from size_code_gen_buffer() which is equal to 0 at that moment.
>
> Partially revert a1b18df9a4, by returning set_memory_options() to its
> original location and only keep 32-bit host VA check and 'memory-backend'
> size check introduced by fe64d06afc at current place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> ---
>
> PS:
> This should take care of regression and give more time to think about
> how to remove size_code_gen_buffer() dependency on ram_size

Thanks for your quick response on this! I just applied this patch on top of latest master (db736e0437aa6fd7c1b7e4599c17f9619ab6b837)
and indeed it seems performance is back to normal. The avocado tests for cubieboard are also passing again like before.

So for me:
Tested-by: Niek Linnenbank <address@hidden>
 

Tested-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>

FWIW I don't think it will take too long to fixup size_code_gen_buffer.
See:

  Subject: [PATCH  v1 0/4] Fix codegen translation cache size
  Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:10:16 +0000
  Message-Id: <address@hidden>

Yeah I saw your patch come by on the list as well Alex. I will try to look into it as well.

Regards,
Niek


> ---
>  softmmu/vl.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
> index a9cce78f45..da7577129c 100644
> --- a/softmmu/vl.c
> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
> @@ -2634,29 +2634,6 @@ static void set_memory_options(uint64_t *ram_slots, ram_addr_t *maxram_size,
>          exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>      }

> -    if (current_machine->ram_memdev_id) {
> -        Object *backend;
> -        ram_addr_t backend_size;
> -
> -        backend = object_resolve_path_type(current_machine->ram_memdev_id,
> -                                           TYPE_MEMORY_BACKEND, NULL);
> -        backend_size = object_property_get_uint(backend, "size",  &error_abort);
> -        if (mem_str && backend_size != ram_size) {
> -                error_report("Size specified by -m option must match size of "
> -                             "explicitly specified 'memory-backend' property");
> -                exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> -        }
> -        ram_size = backend_size;
> -    }
> -
> -    if (!xen_enabled()) {
> -        /* On 32-bit hosts, QEMU is limited by virtual address space */
> -        if (ram_size > (2047 << 20) && HOST_LONG_BITS == 32) {
> -            error_report("at most 2047 MB RAM can be simulated");
> -            exit(1);
> -        }
> -    }
> -
>      loc_pop(&loc);
>  }

> @@ -3821,6 +3798,8 @@ void qemu_init(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>      machine_class = select_machine();
>      object_set_machine_compat_props(machine_class->compat_props);

> +    set_memory_options(&ram_slots, &maxram_size, machine_class);
> +
>      os_daemonize();

>      /*
> @@ -4296,7 +4275,29 @@ void qemu_init(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>          current_machine->cpu_type = parse_cpu_option(cpu_option);
>      }

> -    set_memory_options(&ram_slots, &maxram_size, machine_class);
> +    if (!xen_enabled()) {
> +        /* On 32-bit hosts, QEMU is limited by virtual address space */
> +        if (ram_size > (2047 << 20) && HOST_LONG_BITS == 32) {
> +            error_report("at most 2047 MB RAM can be simulated");
> +            exit(1);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    if (current_machine->ram_memdev_id) {
> +        Object *backend;
> +        ram_addr_t backend_size;
> +
> +        backend = object_resolve_path_type(current_machine->ram_memdev_id,
> +                                           TYPE_MEMORY_BACKEND, NULL);
> +        backend_size = object_property_get_uint(backend, "size",  &error_abort);
> +        if (backend_size != ram_size) {
> +                error_report("Size specified by -m option must match size of "
> +                             "explicitly specified 'memory-backend' property");
> +                exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +        }
> +        ram_size = backend_size;
> +    }
> +
>      current_machine->ram_size = ram_size;
>      current_machine->maxram_size = maxram_size;
>      current_machine->ram_slots = ram_slots;


--
Alex Bennée


--
Niek Linnenbank


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]