qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 07/13] migrate/ram: Get rid of "place_source" in ram_load_


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/13] migrate/ram: Get rid of "place_source" in ram_load_postcopy()
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:24:19 +0100


> Am 19.02.2020 um 21:47 schrieb Peter Xu <address@hidden>:
> 
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:17:19PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> It's always the same value.
> 
> I guess not, because...
> 
>> 
>> Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Juan Quintela <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> migration/ram.c | 8 +++-----
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
>> index cbd54947fb..75014717f6 100644
>> --- a/migration/ram.c
>> +++ b/migration/ram.c
>> @@ -3119,7 +3119,6 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
>>         ram_addr_t addr;
>>         void *host = NULL;
>>         void *page_buffer = NULL;
>> -        void *place_source = NULL;
>>         RAMBlock *block = NULL;
>>         uint8_t ch;
>>         int len;
>> @@ -3188,7 +3187,6 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
>>                 place_needed = true;
>>                 target_pages = 0;
>>             }
>> -            place_source = postcopy_host_page;
>>         }
>> 
>>         switch (flags & ~RAM_SAVE_FLAG_CONTINUE) {
>> @@ -3220,7 +3218,7 @@ static int ram_load_postcopy(QEMUFile *f)
>>                  * buffer to make sure the buffer is valid when
>>                  * placing the page.
>>                  */
>> -                qemu_get_buffer_in_place(f, (uint8_t **)&place_source,
> 
> ... it can be modified inside the call.

Very right, will drop this patch! Thanks!

> 
> I feel like this patch could even fail the QEMU unit test.  It would
> be good to mention what tests have been carried out in the cover
> letter or with RFC tag if no test is done yet.

I test all code I share. This survives „make check“. I assume all tests send 
small pages where „matches_target_page_size==true“, so the tests did not catch 
this.

I even spent the last day getting avocado-vt to work and ran multiple 
(obviously not all) migration tests, including postcopy, so your suggestions 
have already been considered ...

Could have mentioned that in the cover letter, yes.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]