qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Fixed assert in vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Fixed assert in vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:20:01 -0500

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:17:04AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:57:04PM -0500, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> > The current vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy() implementation
> > populates each region of the VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE message without
> > first checking if there are more than VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS already
> > populated. This can cause memory corruption if too many regions are
> > added to the message during the postcopy step.
> > 
> > This change moves an existing assert up such that attempting to
> > construct a VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE message with too many memory
> > regions will gracefully bring down qemu instead of corrupting memory.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Turschmid <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> Could you pls add Fixes: and stable tags?

oh wait no, this is just a theoretical thing, right?
it doesn't actually trigger, it's just a cleanup.

no fixes/stable needed then, sorry

> > ---
> >  hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> > index 2e81f55..cce851a 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> > @@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct 
> > vhost_dev *dev,
> >                                       &offset);
> >          fd = memory_region_get_fd(mr);
> >          if (fd > 0) {
> > +            assert(fd_num < VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
> >              trace_vhost_user_set_mem_table_withfd(fd_num, mr->name,
> >                                                    reg->memory_size,
> >                                                    reg->guest_phys_addr,
> > @@ -455,7 +456,6 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy(struct 
> > vhost_dev *dev,
> >              msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].guest_phys_addr =
> >                  reg->guest_phys_addr;
> >              msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].mmap_offset = offset;
> > -            assert(fd_num < VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS);
> >              fds[fd_num++] = fd;
> >          } else {
> >              u->region_rb_offset[i] = 0;
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]