[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access
From: |
Aleksandar Markovic |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:42:26 +0100 |
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 5:09 PM Richard Henderson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 1/29/20 5:35 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > My additional concern, of course, is: Are other targets exposed to
> > performance
> > degradation, and why?
>
> Potentially, yes. However:
>
> It requires lots of loads in a loop, on a hot path. I would not have guessed
> that the ppc32 Load Multiple Word (et al) was on a hot path at all, since the
> instructions are deprecated. But that's what an ancient os gets you, I
> suppose.
>
OK.
>
> r~
- [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/29
- [PATCH 1/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access for LSW, STSW, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/29
- [PATCH 2/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access for LMW, STMW, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/29
- [PATCH 4/4] target/ppc: Use probe_write for DCBZ, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/29
- [PATCH 3/4] target/ppc: Remove redundant mask in DCBZ, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access, Aleksandar Markovic, 2020/01/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access, Howard Spoelstra, 2020/01/30
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access, Howard Spoelstra, 2020/01/30
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] target/ppc: Use probe_access, David Gibson, 2020/01/30