qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tests/acceptance: boot_linux_console: Add boot Linux


From: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tests/acceptance: boot_linux_console: Add boot Linux with kvm tests
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 19:47:19 -0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0


On 1/22/20 7:02 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:27:51PM -0300, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
+    def test_aarch64_virt_kvm(self):
+        """
+        :avocado: tags=arch:aarch64
+        :avocado: tags=machine:virt
+        :avocado: tags=accel:kvm
+        """
+        self.do_test_aarch64_virt()
+
+    def test_aarch64_virt_tcg(self):
+        """
+        :avocado: tags=arch:aarch64
+        :avocado: tags=machine:virt
+        :avocado: tags=accel:tcg
+        """
+        self.do_test_aarch64_virt()
+
Does do_test_aarch64_virt() add more machine parameters? Also, which cpu
type does it choose? The reason I ask is because aarch64 virt will fail to
run with KVM unless the appropriate gic version is specified (the
gic-version machine parameter). Also the cpu type must be 'host' or 'max'.
'max' is the better choice as it also works for tcg. gic-version also
takes 'max' allowing it to auto-select the appropriate version. So if it's
not already there somewhere, then please ensure aarch64 has these
additional parameters:

  machine:gic-version=max
  cpu:max


The test was passing '-cpu cortex-a56', I replaced with '-cpu max'. Also, now, it passes the gic version as you pointed out. I will send those changes on a v4.

Other than that, I tried '-cpu max -machine virt' (without gic-version) and QEMU crashed:

[root@virtlab-arm03 build]# ./aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64 -accel kvm -cpu max -machine virt -display none -vga none
qemu-system-aarch64: PMU: KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR: Invalid argument
qemu-system-aarch64: failed to set irq for PMU
Aborted (core dumped)

----

Should I expect it to crash or rather nicely fail?

Thanks !

- Wainer



Thanks,
drew




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]