[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PULL 000/111] virtiofs queue
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PULL 000/111] virtiofs queue |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:06:56 +0000 |
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 16:02, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> * Peter Maydell (address@hidden) wrote:
> > I think the case would be better if the
> > doc you were adding was the virtiofsd manpage, which doesn't
> > seem to exist yet).
>
> Yes it does, see 'virtiofsd: add man page' (patch 0094),
> tools/virtiofsd/virtiofsd.texi
I would really like to enforce "no new texi documentation".
Otherwise it ends up on my todo list to have to do the
conversion to rST later, and there's already enough
texi that needs converting :-(
thanks
-- PMM
- [PULL 108/111] virtiofsd: Convert lo_destroy to take the lo->mutex lock itself, (continued)
- [PULL 108/111] virtiofsd: Convert lo_destroy to take the lo->mutex lock itself, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git), 2020/01/23
- [PULL 105/111] virtiofsd: prevent FUSE_INIT/FUSE_DESTROY races, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git), 2020/01/23
- [PULL 104/111] virtiofsd: process requests in a thread pool, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git), 2020/01/23
- [PULL 111/111] virtiofsd: add some options to the help message, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git), 2020/01/23
- [PULL 096/111] virtiofsd: introduce inode refcount to prevent use-after-free, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git), 2020/01/23
- [PULL 103/111] virtiofsd: use fuse_buf_writev to replace fuse_buf_write for better performance, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git), 2020/01/23
- Re: [PULL 000/111] virtiofs queue, Peter Maydell, 2020/01/23
Re: [PULL 000/111] virtiofs queue, no-reply, 2020/01/23