qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ide: Fix incorrect handling of some PRDTs and add the


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ide: Fix incorrect handling of some PRDTs and add the corresponding unit-test
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:23:34 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

Am 22.01.2020 um 12:53 hat Alexander Popov geschrieben:
> On 23.12.2019 20:51, Alexander Popov wrote:
> > Fuzzing the Linux kernel with syzkaller allowed to find how to crash qemu
> > using a special SCSI_IOCTL_SEND_COMMAND. It hits the assertion in
> > ide_dma_cb() introduced in the commit a718978ed58a in July 2015.
> > 
> > This patch series fixes incorrect handling of some PRDTs in ide_dma_cb()
> > and improves the ide-test to cover more PRDT cases (including one
> > that causes that particular qemu crash).
> > 
> > Changes from v2 (thanks to Kevin Wolf for the feedback):
> >  - the assertion about prepare_buf() return value is improved;
> >  - the patch order is reversed to keep the tree bisectable;
> >  - the unit-test performance is improved -- now it runs 8 seconds
> >    instead of 3 minutes on my laptop.
> > 
> > Alexander Popov (2):
> >   ide: Fix incorrect handling of some PRDTs in ide_dma_cb()
> >   tests/ide-test: Create a single unit-test covering more PRDT cases
> > 
> >  hw/ide/core.c    |  30 +++++---
> >  tests/ide-test.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> 
> Hello!
> 
> Pinging again about this fix and unit-test...
> 
> It's ready. Kevin Wolf has reviewed this (thanks a lot!).
> 
> What is next?

I asked John about it just yesterday (if he will merge it or if he would
prefer me to take it through my tree) and he promised to take a look
very soon.

Kevin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]