qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial


From: Christian Ehrhardt 
Subject: [Bug 1859656] Re: [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:24:09 -0000

qemu-kvm doesn't exist for years, I have marked it for qemu instead.
Thanks Frank for making me aware.

Sean got everything right in comment #6, it can only boot one and that is the 
first boot entry.
There is no fallback/fallthrough on s390x.

If you stick with global boot options the host would needs to change the
XML to boot fro disk in this case. (BTW that is the case since the
beginnign the comment is from libvirt 3.5 somewhere around zesty I
think).

P.S. if this ever worked it was a bug that is not to be relied upon (but
I'd wonder)

But that doesn't mean it won't work, just not with that XML format.
I've never tested it but I think you might be able to get away with a proper 
bootorder config.
An example can be found here [1] that you might try (do not implement it 
directly, give it a test please)

[1]:
https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata
/machine-loadparm-multiple-disks-
nets-s390.xml;h=c4e08fd4401bf5bf448ee45ab8890b3e44057f97;hb=HEAD

** Changed in: qemu
       Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859656

Title:
  [2.6] Unable to reboot s390x KVM machine after initial deploy

Status in MAAS:
  Incomplete
Status in QEMU:
  Incomplete
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  MAAS version: 2.6.1 (7832-g17912cdc9-0ubuntu1~18.04.1)
  Arch: S390x

  Appears that MAAS can not find the s390x bootloader to boot from the
  disk, not sure how maas determines this.  However this was working in
  the past. I had originally thought that if the maas machine was
  deployed then it defaulted to boot from disk.

  If I force the VM to book from disk, the VM starts up as expected.

  Reproduce:

  - Deploy Disco on S390x KVM instance
  - Reboot it

  on the KVM console...

  Connected to domain s2lp6g001
  Escape character is ^]
  done
    Using IPv4 address: 10.246.75.160
    Using TFTP server: 10.246.72.3
    Bootfile name: 'boots390x.bin'
    Receiving data:  0 KBytes
    TFTP error: file not found: boots390x.bin
  Trying pxelinux.cfg files...
    Receiving data:  0 KBytes
    Receiving data:  0 KBytes
  Failed to load OS from network

  ==> /var/log/maas/rackd.log <==
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] 
boots390x.bin requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] 
s390x/65a9ca43-9541-49be-b315-e2ca85936ea2 requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] 
s390x/01-52-54-00-e5-d7-bb requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] 
s390x/0AF64BA0 requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] 
s390x/0AF64BA requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] 
s390x/0AF64B requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] s390x/0AF64 
requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] s390x/0AF6 
requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] s390x/0AF 
requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] s390x/0A 
requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] s390x/0 
requested by 10.246.75.160
  2020-01-14 18:21:24 provisioningserver.rackdservices.tftp: [info] 
s390x/default requested by 10.246.75.160

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1859656/+subscriptions



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]