qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 040/104] virtiofsd: Pass write iov's all the way through


From: Xiao Yang
Subject: Re: [PATCH 040/104] virtiofsd: Pass write iov's all the way through
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:08:09 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.2; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11

On 2019/12/13 0:38, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"<address@hidden>

Pass the write iov pointing to guest RAM all the way through rather
than copying the data.

Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert<address@hidden>
---
  tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
index 99c877ea2e..3c778b6296 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
@@ -452,6 +452,10 @@ static void *fv_queue_thread(void *opaque)
                   __func__, qi->qidx, (size_t)evalue, in_bytes, out_bytes);

          while (1) {
+            bool allocated_bufv = false;
+            struct fuse_bufvec bufv;
+            struct fuse_bufvec *pbufv;
+
              /*
               * An element contains one request and the space to send our
               * response They're spread over multiple descriptors in a
@@ -493,14 +497,76 @@ static void *fv_queue_thread(void *opaque)
                           __func__, elem->index);
                  assert(0); /* TODO */
              }
-            copy_from_iov(&fbuf, out_num, out_sg);
-            fbuf.size = out_len;
+            /* Copy just the first element and look at it */
+            copy_from_iov(&fbuf, 1, out_sg);
+
+            if (out_num>  2&&
+                out_sg[0].iov_len == sizeof(struct fuse_in_header)&&
+                ((struct fuse_in_header *)fbuf.mem)->opcode == FUSE_WRITE&&
+                out_sg[1].iov_len == sizeof(struct fuse_write_in)) {
+                /*
+                 * For a write we don't actually need to copy the
+                 * data, we can just do it straight out of guest memory
+                 * but we must still copy the headers in case the guest
+                 * was nasty and changed them while we were using them.
+                 */
+                fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: Write special case\n", __func__);
+
+                /* copy the fuse_write_in header after the fuse_in_header */
+                fbuf.mem += out_sg->iov_len;
+                copy_from_iov(&fbuf, 1, out_sg + 1);
+                fbuf.mem -= out_sg->iov_len;
+                fbuf.size = out_sg[0].iov_len + out_sg[1].iov_len;
+
+                /* Allocate the bufv, with space for the rest of the iov */
+                allocated_bufv = true;
+                pbufv = malloc(sizeof(struct fuse_bufvec) +
+                               sizeof(struct fuse_buf) * (out_num - 2));
+                if (!pbufv) {
+                    vu_queue_unpop(dev, q, elem, 0);
+                    free(elem);
+                    fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_ERR, "%s: pbufv malloc failed\n",
+                             __func__);
+                    goto out;
+                }
+
+                pbufv->count = 1;
+                pbufv->buf[0] = fbuf;
+
+                size_t iovindex, pbufvindex;
+                iovindex = 2; /* 2 headers, separate iovs */
+                pbufvindex = 1; /* 2 headers, 1 fusebuf */
+
+                for (; iovindex<  out_num; iovindex++, pbufvindex++) {
+                    pbufv->count++;
+                    pbufv->buf[pbufvindex].pos = ~0; /* Dummy */
+                    pbufv->buf[pbufvindex].flags = 0;
+                    pbufv->buf[pbufvindex].mem = out_sg[iovindex].iov_base;
+                    pbufv->buf[pbufvindex].size = out_sg[iovindex].iov_len;
+                }
+            } else {
+                /* Normal (non fast write) path */
+
+                /* Copy the rest of the buffer */
+                fbuf.mem += out_sg->iov_len;
+                copy_from_iov(&fbuf, out_num - 1, out_sg + 1);
+                fbuf.mem -= out_sg->iov_len;
+                fbuf.size = out_len;

-            /* TODO! Endianness of header */
+                /* TODO! Endianness of header */

-            /* TODO: Add checks for fuse_session_exited */
-            struct fuse_bufvec bufv = { .buf[0] = fbuf, .count = 1 };
-            fuse_session_process_buf_int(se,&bufv,&ch);
+                /* TODO: Add checks for fuse_session_exited */
+                bufv.buf[0] = fbuf;
+                bufv.count = 1;
+                pbufv =&bufv;
+            }
+            pbufv->idx = 0;
+            pbufv->off = 0;
+            fuse_session_process_buf_int(se, pbufv,&ch);
+
+            if (allocated_bufv) {
+                free(pbufv);
+            }

              if (!qi->reply_sent) {
                  fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: elem %d no reply sent\n",
@@ -514,6 +580,7 @@ static void *fv_queue_thread(void *opaque)
              elem = NULL;
          }
      }
+out:
      pthread_mutex_destroy(&ch.lock);
      free(fbuf.mem);

Hi,

Tested the patch and got the correct data written by guest, so it looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Xiao Yang <address@hidden>

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]