|
| From: | Richard Henderson |
| Subject: | Re: qemu-x86_64, buster /sbin/ldconfig and setup_arg_pages (a mind dump) |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:10:54 -1000 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 |
On 1/17/20 7:33 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > So what do we take away from this? > > * we need testcases to exercise the memory layout of dynamic binaries > * "special" dynamic binaries can break our careful memory layout > * I feel as though I've trodden on a nest of vipers > > Does any of this track with you? What is different about ldconfig that > breaks our memory placement? We've been through this bug before, but never came to a resolution. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1749393 https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-03/msg04700.html r~
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |