RE: [PATCH RFC 01/12] migration: Add multiRDMA capability support

[fengzhimin]

Thanks for your review. I will modify its according to your suggestions.

-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Quintela [mailto:address@hidden] 
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:19 PM
To: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
Cc: fengzhimin <address@hidden>; address@hidden; address@hidden; 
address@hidden; Zhanghailiang <address@hidden>; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/12] migration: Add multiRDMA capability support

"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Zhimin Feng (address@hidden) wrote:
>> From: fengzhimin <address@hidden>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: fengzhimin <address@hidden>
>
> Instead of creating x-multirdma as a capability and the corresponding 
> parameter for the number of channels; it would be better just to use 
> the multifd parameters when used with an rdma transport; as far as I 
> know multifd doesn't work with rdma at the moment, and to the user the 
> idea of multifd over rdma is just the same thing.

I was about to suggest that.  We could setup both capabilities:

multifd + rdma