[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v2 84/86] tests:numa-test: use explicit memdev to specify node RA
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
[PATCH v2 84/86] tests:numa-test: use explicit memdev to specify node RAM |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:07:39 +0100 |
Follow up patches will remove automatic RAM distribution
between nodes and will make default machine types require
"memdev" option instead of legacy "mem" option.
Make tests to follow new rules and add an additional test
for legacy "mem" option on old machine type, to make sure
it won't regress in the future.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
---
CC: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden
---
tests/qtest/numa-test.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c
index a696dfd..322d2ef 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c
@@ -25,9 +25,8 @@ static void test_mon_explicit(const void *data)
g_autofree char *s = NULL;
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
- cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 "
- "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3 "
- "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7 ");
+ cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram,cpus=0-3 "
+ "-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7");
qts = qtest_init(cli);
s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa");
@@ -37,13 +36,13 @@ static void test_mon_explicit(const void *data)
qtest_quit(qts);
}
-static void test_mon_default(const void *data)
+static void test_def_cpu_split(const void *data)
{
QTestState *qts;
g_autofree char *s = NULL;
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
- cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node -numa node");
+ cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node,memdev=ram -numa node");
qts = qtest_init(cli);
s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa");
@@ -53,6 +52,23 @@ static void test_mon_default(const void *data)
qtest_quit(qts);
}
+static void test_pc_legacy_mem(const void *data)
+{
+ QTestState *qts;
+ g_autofree char *s = NULL;
+ g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
+
+ cli = make_cli(data, "-M pc-i440fx-4.2 -smp 8 "
+ "-numa node,mem=64M -numa node,mem=64M");
+ qts = qtest_init(cli);
+
+ s = qtest_hmp(qts, "info numa");
+ g_assert(strstr(s, "node 0 size: 64 MB"));
+ g_assert(strstr(s, "node 1 size: 64 MB"));
+
+ qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
static void test_mon_partial(const void *data)
{
QTestState *qts;
@@ -60,7 +76,7 @@ static void test_mon_partial(const void *data)
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 "
- "-numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1 "
+ "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram,cpus=0-1 "
"-numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-5 ");
qts = qtest_init(cli);
@@ -87,7 +103,8 @@ static void test_query_cpus(const void *data)
QTestState *qts;
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
- cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node,cpus=0-3 -numa node,cpus=4-7");
+ cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 8 -numa node,memdev=ram,cpus=0-3 "
+ "-numa node,cpus=4-7");
qts = qtest_init(cli);
cpus = get_cpus(qts, &resp);
g_assert(cpus);
@@ -125,7 +142,7 @@ static void pc_numa_cpu(const void *data)
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
cli = make_cli(data, "-cpu pentium -smp 8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2 "
- "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 "
+ "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=1,thread-id=0 "
@@ -178,7 +195,7 @@ static void spapr_numa_cpu(const void *data)
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 4,cores=4 "
- "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 "
+ "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=1 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,core-id=2 "
@@ -223,7 +240,7 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data)
g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
cli = make_cli(data, "-smp 2 "
- "-numa node,nodeid=0 -numa node,nodeid=1 "
+ "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1");
qts = qtest_init(cli);
@@ -263,13 +280,14 @@ static void pc_dynamic_cpu_cfg(const void *data)
QDict *resp;
QList *cpus;
QTestState *qs;
+ g_autofree char *cli = NULL;
- qs = qtest_initf("%s -nodefaults --preconfig -smp 2",
- data ? (char *)data : "");
+ cli = make_cli(data, "-nodefaults --preconfig -smp 2");
+ qs = qtest_init(cli);
/* create 2 numa nodes */
g_assert(!qmp_rsp_is_err(qtest_qmp(qs, "{ 'execute': 'set-numa-node',"
- " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 0 } }")));
+ " 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 0, 'memdev': 'ram' } }")));
g_assert(!qmp_rsp_is_err(qtest_qmp(qs, "{ 'execute': 'set-numa-node',"
" 'arguments': { 'type': 'node', 'nodeid': 1 } }")));
@@ -535,10 +553,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if (strcmp(arch, "aarch64") == 0) {
g_string_append(args, " -machine virt");
}
+ if (!strcmp(arch, "ppc64")) {
+ g_string_append(args, " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram,size=512M");
+ } else {
+ g_string_append(args, " -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram,size=128M");
+ }
g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
- qtest_add_data_func("/numa/mon/default", args, test_mon_default);
+ qtest_add_data_func("/numa/mon/cpus/default", args, test_def_cpu_split);
qtest_add_data_func("/numa/mon/cpus/explicit", args, test_mon_explicit);
qtest_add_data_func("/numa/mon/cpus/partial", args, test_mon_partial);
qtest_add_data_func("/numa/qmp/cpus/query-cpus", args, test_query_cpus);
@@ -549,6 +572,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
qtest_add_data_func("/numa/pc/hmat/build", args, pc_hmat_build_cfg);
qtest_add_data_func("/numa/pc/hmat/off", args, pc_hmat_off_cfg);
qtest_add_data_func("/numa/pc/hmat/erange", args, pc_hmat_erange_cfg);
+ qtest_add_data_func("/numa/pc/legacy/mem", args, test_pc_legacy_mem);
}
if (!strcmp(arch, "ppc64")) {
--
2.7.4
- [PATCH v2 79/86] make mem_path local variable, (continued)
[PATCH v2 76/86] post conversion default_ram_id cleanup, Igor Mammedov, 2020/01/15
[PATCH v2 81/86] hostmem: fix strict bind policy, Igor Mammedov, 2020/01/15
[PATCH v2 84/86] tests:numa-test: use explicit memdev to specify node RAM,
Igor Mammedov <=
[PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Igor Mammedov, 2020/01/15
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Peter Krempa, 2020/01/15
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Igor Mammedov, 2020/01/15
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Michal Privoznik, 2020/01/16
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Igor Mammedov, 2020/01/16
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Michal Privoznik, 2020/01/16
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Igor Mammedov, 2020/01/16
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/01/16
- Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, Igor Mammedov, 2020/01/16
Re: [PATCH v2 82/86] numa: forbid '-numa node, mem' for 5.0 and newer machine types, David Gibson, 2020/01/15