Re: Priority of -accel

[Christophe de Dinechin]

> On 13 Jan 2020, at 17:25, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> On 13/01/20 17:17, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Perfect opportunity to change the default to something more useful.
> 
> I am not sure acutally if it's that more useful, now that we have
> sanctioned qemu-kvm as the fast alternative.

OK, half a joke, but we should have tested on “q” at the beginning
rather than “-kvm” at the end ;-)

emu being the slow one ;-)