[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Priority of -accel

From: Christophe de Dinechin
Subject: Re: Priority of -accel
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:14:49 +0100

> On 13 Jan 2020, at 15:39, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> 'any' is a russian roulette, you don't want it to return 'qtest' ;)
>>> We could make it return "qtest" only on April 1st ;-P
>> ... or we finally dare to let QEMU chose the "best" accelerator by
>> default if no "-accel" option has been specified...
> Changing a default that has ceased to make sense a decade ago?  Are you
> out of your mind?
> ;-P

Well, it makes perfect sense, since we select kvm first on macOS and, I guess,
all non-Linux platforms ;-)

% ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64   
qemu-system-x86_64: invalid accelerator kvm
qemu-system-x86_64: falling back to tcg

(Fixing that knowing that CONFIG_KVM is poisoned in vl.c is left as an
exercise for the reader)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]