[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v2 04/10] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
[PATCH v2 04/10] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:48:21 +1100 |
When running guests under a hypervisor, the hypervisor obviously needs to
be protected from guest accesses even if those are in what the guest
considers real mode (translation off). The POWER hardware provides two
ways of doing that: The old way has guest real mode accesses simply offset
and bounds checked into host addresses. It works, but requires that a
significant chunk of the guest's memory - the RMA - be physically
contiguous in the host, which is pretty inconvenient. The new way, known
as VRMA, has guest real mode accesses translated in roughly the normal way
but with some special parameters.
In POWER7 and POWER8 the LPCR[VPM0] bit selected between the two modes, but
in POWER9 only VRMA mode is supported and LPCR[VPM0] no longer exists. We
handle that difference in behaviour in ppc_hash64_set_isi().. but not in
other places that we blindly check LPCR[VPM0].
Correct those instances with a new helper to tell if we should be in VRMA
mode.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
---
target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
index 5fabd93c92..d878180df5 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
@@ -668,6 +668,19 @@ unsigned ppc_hash64_hpte_page_shift_noslb(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
return 0;
}
+static bool ppc_hash64_use_vrma(CPUPPCState *env)
+{
+ switch (env->mmu_model) {
+ case POWERPC_MMU_3_00:
+ /* ISAv3.0 (POWER9) always uses VRMA, the VPM0 field and RMOR
+ * register no longer exist */
+ return true;
+
+ default:
+ return !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
+ }
+}
+
static void ppc_hash64_set_isi(CPUState *cs, uint64_t error_code)
{
CPUPPCState *env = &POWERPC_CPU(cs)->env;
@@ -676,15 +689,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_set_isi(CPUState *cs, uint64_t
error_code)
if (msr_ir) {
vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
} else {
- switch (env->mmu_model) {
- case POWERPC_MMU_3_00:
- /* Field deprecated in ISAv3.00 - interrupts always go to hyperv */
- vpm = true;
- break;
- default:
- vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
- break;
- }
+ vpm = ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env);
}
if (vpm && !msr_hv) {
cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HISI;
@@ -702,15 +707,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_set_dsi(CPUState *cs, uint64_t dar,
uint64_t dsisr)
if (msr_dr) {
vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
} else {
- switch (env->mmu_model) {
- case POWERPC_MMU_3_00:
- /* Field deprecated in ISAv3.00 - interrupts always go to hyperv */
- vpm = true;
- break;
- default:
- vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
- break;
- }
+ vpm = ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env);
}
if (vpm && !msr_hv) {
cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HDSI;
@@ -799,7 +796,7 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
eaddr,
if (!(eaddr >> 63)) {
raddr |= env->spr[SPR_HRMOR];
}
- } else if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
+ } else if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
/* Emulated VRMA mode */
slb = &env->vrma_slb;
if (!slb->sps) {
@@ -967,7 +964,7 @@ hwaddr ppc_hash64_get_phys_page_debug(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
target_ulong addr)
} else if ((msr_hv || !env->has_hv_mode) && !(addr >> 63)) {
/* In HV mode, add HRMOR if top EA bit is clear */
return raddr | env->spr[SPR_HRMOR];
- } else if (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0) {
+ } else if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
/* Emulated VRMA mode */
slb = &env->vrma_slb;
if (!slb->sps) {
@@ -1056,8 +1053,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
slb->sps = NULL;
/* Is VRMA enabled ? */
- lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
- if (!(lpcr & LPCR_VPM0)) {
+ if (ppc_hash64_use_vrma(env)) {
return;
}
@@ -1065,6 +1061,7 @@ static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
* Make one up. Mostly ignore the ESID which will not be needed
* for translation
*/
+ lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
vsid = SLB_VSID_VRMA;
vrmasd = (lpcr & LPCR_VRMASD) >> LPCR_VRMASD_SHIFT;
vsid |= (vrmasd << 4) & (SLB_VSID_L | SLB_VSID_LP);
--
2.24.1
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] ppc: Remove stub of PPC970 HID4 implementation, (continued)
- [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Drop PPC_EMULATE_32BITS_HYPV stub, David Gibson, 2020/01/06
- [PATCH v2 03/10] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU, David Gibson, 2020/01/06
- [PATCH v2 08/10] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS], David Gibson, 2020/01/06
- [PATCH v2 06/10] target/ppc: Remove RMOR register from POWER9 & POWER10, David Gibson, 2020/01/06
- [PATCH v2 04/10] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper,
David Gibson <=
- [PATCH v2 10/10] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand, David Gibson, 2020/01/06
- [PATCH v2 09/10] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table, David Gibson, 2020/01/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table, Cédric Le Goater, 2020/01/08