qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 08/28] target/i386: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of templat


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/28] target/i386: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of templates
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:42:58 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.3.5; emacs 27.0.50

Richard Henderson <address@hidden> writes:

> Do not use exec/cpu_ldst_{,useronly_}template.h directly,
> but instead use the functional interface.
>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/i386/seg_helper.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/seg_helper.c b/target/i386/seg_helper.c
> index 87a627f9dc..b96de068ca 100644
> --- a/target/i386/seg_helper.c
> +++ b/target/i386/seg_helper.c
> @@ -37,37 +37,37 @@
>  # define LOG_PCALL_STATE(cpu) do { } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> -#define MEMSUFFIX _kernel
> -#define DATA_SIZE 1
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> +/*
> + * TODO: Convert callers to compute cpu_mmu_index_kernel once
> + * and use *_mmuidx_ra directly.
> + */

I guess this would only be if it was a significant performance impact?
They seem to be mainly called for (I assume) infrequently called
helpers.

Anyway lgtm:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>


> +#define cpu_ldub_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_ldub_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_lduw_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_ldl_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_ldl_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_ldq_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_ldq_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
>  
> -#define DATA_SIZE 2
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> +#define cpu_stb_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stb_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_stw_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stw_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_stl_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stl_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_stq_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stq_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
>  
> -#define DATA_SIZE 4
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> +#define cpu_ldub_kernel(e, p)    cpu_ldub_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
> +#define cpu_lduw_kernel(e, p)    cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
> +#define cpu_ldl_kernel(e, p)     cpu_ldl_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
> +#define cpu_ldq_kernel(e, p)     cpu_ldq_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
>  
> -#define DATA_SIZE 8
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> -#undef MEMSUFFIX
> -#else
> -#define CPU_MMU_INDEX (cpu_mmu_index_kernel(env))
> -#define MEMSUFFIX _kernel
> -#define DATA_SIZE 1
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -
> -#define DATA_SIZE 2
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -
> -#define DATA_SIZE 4
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -
> -#define DATA_SIZE 8
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -#undef CPU_MMU_INDEX
> -#undef MEMSUFFIX
> -#endif
> +#define cpu_stb_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stb_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
> +#define cpu_stw_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stw_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
> +#define cpu_stl_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stl_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
> +#define cpu_stq_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stq_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
>  
>  /* return non zero if error */
>  static inline int load_segment_ra(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t *e1_ptr,


-- 
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]