Re: [PATCH 22/28] target/xtensa: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1,2,3}

qemu-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 22/28] target/xtensa: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1,2,3}_SUFFIX

From:	Max Filippov
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 22/28] target/xtensa: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1,2,3}_SUFFIX
Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:46:18 -0800

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 8:01 PM Richard Henderson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> The functions generated by these macros are unused.
>
> Cc: Max Filippov <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/xtensa/cpu.h | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Max Filippov <address@hidden>

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH 13/28] linux-user: Include trace-root.h in syscall-trace.h, (continued)
- [PATCH 13/28] linux-user: Include trace-root.h in syscall-trace.h, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
- [PATCH 16/28] target/alpha: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1}_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
- [PATCH 14/28] cputlb: Expand cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h in user-exec.c, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
  - [PATCH 14/28] cputlb: Expand cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h in user-exec.c, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/12/12
- [PATCH 21/28] target/unicore32: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1}_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
- [PATCH 23/28] target/m68k: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE{0, 1}_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
  - Re: [PATCH 23/28] target/m68k: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE{0,1}_SUFFIX, Laurent Vivier, 2019/12/12
  - Re: [PATCH 23/28] target/m68k: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE{0, 1}_SUFFIX, Laurent Vivier, 2019/12/12
    - Re: [PATCH 23/28] target/m68k: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE{0, 1}_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/12
- [PATCH 22/28] target/xtensa: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1,2,3}_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
  - Re: [PATCH 22/28] target/xtensa: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1,2,3}_SUFFIX, Max Filippov <=
- [PATCH 25/28] target/s390x: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
  - Re: [PATCH 25/28] target/s390x: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX, David Hildenbrand, 2019/12/12
- [PATCH 24/28] target/mips: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
  - Re: [PATCH 24/28] target/mips: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/12/12
- [PATCH 20/28] target/sh4: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1}_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
- [PATCH 26/28] target/ppc: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
  - Re: [PATCH 26/28] target/ppc: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX, David Gibson, 2019/12/12
- [PATCH 27/28] cputlb: Remove support for MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
- [PATCH 28/28] cputlb: Expand cpu_ldst_template.h in cputlb.c, Richard Henderson, 2019/12/11
  - Re: [PATCH 28/28] cputlb: Expand cpu_ldst_template.h in cputlb.c, Aleksandar Markovic, 2019/12/12

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/28] target/xtensa: Use probe_access for itlb_hit_test
Next by Date: [PULL 00/10] Bluetooth removal, and qtest & misc patches
Previous by thread: [PATCH 22/28] target/xtensa: Remove MMU_MODE{0,1,2,3}_SUFFIX
Next by thread: [PATCH 25/28] target/s390x: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of MMU_MODE*_SUFFIX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread