Re: [RFC PATCH 02/11] gdbstub: stop passing GDBState * around

[Damien Hedde]

On 11/15/19 6:29 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> We only have one GDBState which should be allocated at the time we
> process any commands. This will make further clean-up a bit easier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> ---
>  gdbstub.c | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)

Do we know why we choose to pass GDBState * everywhere ?
It sounds like a way to eventually handle multiple gdb connections but I
don't know if it has some sense.

Damien