Re: [PATCH] WHPX: refactor load library

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:35:59PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 11/12/19 8:47 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 06:42:00PM +0000, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sunil Muthuswamy
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 12:32 PM
> > > > To: 'Paolo Bonzini' <address@hidden>; 'Richard Henderson' 
> > > > <address@hidden>; 'Eduardo Habkost' <address@hidden>; 'Stefan
> > > > Weil' <address@hidden>
> > > > Cc: 'address@hidden' <address@hidden>; Justin Terry (VM) 
> > > > <address@hidden>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] WHPX: refactor load library
> > > > 
> > > > This refactors the load library of WHV libraries to make it more
> > > > modular. It makes a helper routine that can be called on demand.
> > > > This allows future expansion of load library/functions to support
> > > > functionality that is depenedent on some feature being available.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil Muthuswamy <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Can I possibly get some eyes on this?
> > 
> > I'd be glad to queue the patch if we get a Reviewed-by line from
> > somebody who understands Windows and WHPX.  Maybe Justin?
> 
> Can we wait for approval from the Microsoft legal department first?
> So we can start testing WHPX builds, and reduce the possibilities to
> introduce regressions.
> 
> Testing is ready, we are waiting for Microsoft to merge, see:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg646351.html

Making it easier for other people to test WHPX would be nice.
But in case this is not sorted out soon, I don't see a reason to
not merge WHPX changes if they are reviewed and approved by the
main author of that code (Justin).

-- 
Eduardo