qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] testing/next (netbsd stuff)


From: Kamil Rytarowski
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] testing/next (netbsd stuff)
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:53:18 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2

On 07.11.2019 18:46, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 17:39, Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we approach hard-freeze I'm trying to temper what comes in through
>> the testing/next tree. However it would be nice to get the NetBSD upto
>> speed with the other NetBSDs. Although the serial install is working
>> well for me this has had a rocky road so if others could also give it
>> a good testing that would be great. I've also disabled one of the
>> regular failing tests for non-Linux targets. There are other tests
>> that still fail however including the tests/test-aio-multithread which
>> asserts in the async utils around about 20% of the time:
>>
>>   assertion "QSLIST_EMPTY(&ctx->scheduled_coroutines)" failed: file
>>     "/home/qemu/qemu-test.nS1czd/src/util/async.c", line 279, function
>>     "aio_ctx_finalize"
> 
> This is unrelated to your NetBSD update in this series -- it's
> one of the persistent intermittents I see on the BSDs:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20190916153312.GD25552@stefanha-x1.localdomain/t/
> 
> (though the failure rate I see is I think <20%, but I haven't
> really carefully measured it.)
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

Does this patch rely on AIO API in the kernel? If so than this is
unreliable as of today on NetBSD. We plan to fix it, but there is no
expected time of accomplishment.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]