[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source
|
From: |
Dietmar Maurer |
|
Subject: |
Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:18:27 +0100 (CET) |
> The thing is, it just seems unnecessary to me to take the source cluster
> size into account in general. It seems weird that a medium only allows
> 4 MB reads, because, well, guests aren’t going to take that into account.
Maybe it is strange, but it is quite obvious that there is an optimal cluster
size for each storage type (4M in case of ceph)...
- backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Dietmar Maurer, 2019/11/05
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Max Reitz, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Wolfgang Bumiller, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Max Reitz, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Dietmar Maurer, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Max Reitz, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Max Reitz, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Dietmar Maurer, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Max Reitz, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Dietmar Maurer, 2019/11/06
- Re: backup_calculate_cluster_size does not consider source, Max Reitz, 2019/11/06