qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] hw/arm/raspi: Add thermal/timer, improve address sp


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] hw/arm/raspi: Add thermal/timer, improve address space, run U-boot
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:46:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1

On 10/24/19 3:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 00:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:

Since v2:
- fixed issue in videocore address space
- allow to start with some cores OFF (to boot firmwares)
- add proof-of-concept test for '-smp cores=1' and U-boot
- fixed my email setup

Previous cover:

Hi,

Some patches from v1 are already merged. This v2 addresses the
review comment from v1, and add patches to clean the memory
space when using multiple cores.

Laurent, if you test U-Boot with this patchset again, do you mind
replying with a "Tested-by:" tag?

The next patchset is probably about the interrupt controller blocks,
then will come another one about the MBox/Properties.

The last patch is unrelated to the series, but since I cleaned this
for the raspi and the highbank is the only board with the same issue,
I included the patch in this series.

I'm going to apply 1-10 and 14 to target-arm.next.
(I've reviewed 10, and the rest have been reviewed.)

Thanks!

Do you mind amending this to patch #3
"hw/timer/bcm2835: Add the BCM2835 SYS_timer"
or should I respin (or resend it alone)?

-- >8 --
diff --git a/hw/timer/bcm2835_systmr.c b/hw/timer/bcm2835_systmr.c
index 49b40b55f9..3387a6214a 100644
--- a/hw/timer/bcm2835_systmr.c
+++ b/hw/timer/bcm2835_systmr.c
@@ -115,10 +115,7 @@ static void bcm2835_systmr_reset(DeviceState *dev)
 {
     BCM2835SystemTimerState *s = BCM2835_SYSTIMER(dev);

-    s->reg.status = 0;
-    for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->reg.compare); i++) {
-        s->reg.compare[i] = 0;
-    }
+    memset(&s->reg, 0, sizeof(s->reg));
 }

---

Thanks,

Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]