qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 02/32] hw/i386/pc: Move kvm_i8259_init() declaration to sysem


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/32] hw/i386/pc: Move kvm_i8259_init() declaration to sysemu/kvm.h
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:40:18 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 17/10/2019 17.31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 10/17/19 5:04 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 15/10/2019 18.26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Move the KVM-related call to "sysemu/kvm.h".
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>   include/hw/i386/pc.h | 1 -
>>>   include/sysemu/kvm.h | 1 +
>>>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
>>> index 6df4f4b6fb..09e74e7764 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ typedef struct PCMachineClass {
>>>     extern DeviceState *isa_pic;
>>>   qemu_irq *i8259_init(ISABus *bus, qemu_irq parent_irq);
>>> -qemu_irq *kvm_i8259_init(ISABus *bus);
>>>   int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d);
>>>   int pic_get_output(DeviceState *d);
>>>   diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
>>> index 9d143282bc..da8aa9f5a8 100644
>>> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
>>> @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ void kvm_irqchip_set_qemuirq_gsi(KVMState *s,
>>> qemu_irq irq, int gsi);
>>>   void kvm_pc_gsi_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level);
>>>   void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled);
>>>   void kvm_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s);
>>> +qemu_irq *kvm_i8259_init(ISABus *bus);
>>
>> Why? The function is defined in hw/i386/kvm/ - so moving its prototype
>> to a generic header sounds wrong to me.
> 
> This function is declared when compiling without KVM, and is available
> on the Alpha/HPPA/MIPS which don't have it.

Sorry, I failed to parse your last sentence. It's only used by hw/i386
code as far as I can see.

> You'd rather move the kvm_pc_* declarations to hw/i386/kvm/?

Maybe, but that's certainly something for a different patch series.

This series here should focus on what you've mentioned in the cover
letter, I think. It's already big enough.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]