qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC v5 121/126] hw/sd/ssi-sd.c: introduce ERRP_AUTO_PROPAGATE


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 121/126] hw/sd/ssi-sd.c: introduce ERRP_AUTO_PROPAGATE
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 11:14:14 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0

On 10/14/19 11:07 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
12.10.2019 9:33, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/11/19 6:05 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
If we want to add some info to errp (by error_prepend() or
error_append_hint()), we must use the ERRP_AUTO_PROPAGATE macro.
Otherwise, this info will not be added when errp == &fatal_err
(the program will exit prior to the error_append_hint() or
error_prepend() call).  Fix such cases.

If we want to check error after errp-function call, we need to
introduce local_err and than propagate it to errp. Instead, use
ERRP_AUTO_PROPAGATE macro, benefits are:
1. No need of explicit error_propagate call
2. No need of explicit local_err variable: use errp directly
3. ERRP_AUTO_PROPAGATE leaves errp as is if it's not NULL or
     &error_fatel, this means that we don't break error_abort
     (we'll abort on error_set, not on error_propagate)

This commit (together with its neighbors) was generated by

for f in $(git grep -l errp \*.[ch]); do \
      spatch --sp-file scripts/coccinelle/auto-propagated-errp.cocci \
      --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h --in-place --no-show-diff $f; \
done;

then fix a bit of compilation problems: coccinelle for some reason
leaves several
f() {
      ...
      goto out;
      ...
      out:
}
patterns, with "out:" at function end.

then
./python/commit-per-subsystem.py MAINTAINERS "$(< auto-msg)"

(auto-msg was a file with this commit message)

Still, for backporting it may be more comfortable to use only the first
command and then do one huge commit.

Reported-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
Reported-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
---
   hw/sd/ssi-sd.c | 14 ++++++++------
   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/ssi-sd.c b/hw/sd/ssi-sd.c
index 91db069212..f42204d649 100644
--- a/hw/sd/ssi-sd.c
+++ b/hw/sd/ssi-sd.c
@@ -241,10 +241,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ssi_sd = {
   static void ssi_sd_realize(SSISlave *d, Error **errp)
   {
+    ERRP_AUTO_PROPAGATE();
       ssi_sd_state *s = FROM_SSI_SLAVE(ssi_sd_state, d);
       DeviceState *carddev;
       DriveInfo *dinfo;
-    Error *err = NULL;
       qbus_create_inplace(&s->sdbus, sizeof(s->sdbus), TYPE_SD_BUS,
                           DEVICE(d), "sd-bus");
@@ -254,12 +254,14 @@ static void ssi_sd_realize(SSISlave *d, Error **errp)
       dinfo = drive_get_next(IF_SD);
       carddev = qdev_create(BUS(&s->sdbus), TYPE_SD_CARD);
       if (dinfo) {
-        qdev_prop_set_drive(carddev, "drive", blk_by_legacy_dinfo(dinfo), 
&err);
+        qdev_prop_set_drive(carddev, "drive", blk_by_legacy_dinfo(dinfo),
+                            errp);

This fits 72 chars, can you keep it in the same line?

Honestly, I'd prefer not fixing code style in these 100 auto-generated 
commits...
But if only you request this, it's not a problem.

Ah, Coccinelle added the newline. Hmm maybe there is a spatch argument to set the maximum line length?

$ spatch --longhelp
[...]
--linux-spacing spacing of + code follows the conventions of Linux --smpl-spacing spacing of + code follows the semantic patch
  --indent                      default indent, in spaces (no tabs)
  --max-width                   column limit for generated code

Have you tried --max-width? Maybe we need a combination with --smpl-spacing.


       }
-    object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(carddev), true, "spi", &err);
-    object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(carddev), true, "realized", &err);
-    if (err) {
-        error_setg(errp, "failed to init SD card: %s", error_get_pretty(err));
+    object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(carddev), true, "spi", errp);
+    object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(carddev), true, "realized", errp);
+    if (*errp) {
+        error_setg(errp, "failed to init SD card: %s",
+                   error_get_pretty(*errp));

Ditto...

           return;
       }
   }


If possible please squash with "47/126 SD (Secure Card)"

Hmm this is in separate, as it's unmaintained accordingly to MAINTAINERS. I'll 
rebase
the next version on your MAINTAINERS-fixes and it should work.


Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

Thanks!




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]