Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] IDE: deprecate ide-drive

[John Snow]

On 10/10/19 7:54 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 13:42:26 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 10/10/19 1:26 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 13:22:37 +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> On 10/10/19 12:43 AM, John Snow wrote:
>>>>> It's an old compatibility shim that just delegates to ide-cd or ide-hd.
>>>>> I'd like to refactor these some day, and getting rid of the super-object
>>>>> will make that easier.
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way, we don't need this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Libvirt-checked-by: Peter Krempa <address@hidden>
>>>>
>>>> Peter made a comment regarding Laszlo's Regression-tested-by tag:
>>>>
>>>>    [...] nobody else is using
>>>>    this convention (there are exactly 0 instances of
>>>>    "Regression-tested-by" in the project git log as far as
>>>>    I can see), and so in practice people reading the commits
>>>>    won't really know what you meant by it. Everybody else
>>>>    on the project uses "Tested-by" to mean either of the
>>>>    two cases you describe above, without distinction...
>>>>
>>>> It probably applies to 'Libvirt-checked-by' too.
>>>
>>> I certainly didn't test it. So feel free to drop that line altogether.
>>
>> But you reviewed it, can we use your 'Reviewed-by' instead?
> 
> To be honest, I didn't really review the code nor the documentation.
> I actually reviewed only the idea itself in the context of integration
> with libvirt and that's why I didn't go for 'Reviewed-by:'.
> 
> The gist of the citation above is that we should stick to well known
> tags with their well known meanings and I think that considering this a
> 'review' would be a stretch of the definiton.
> 

I wasn't aware that PMM wanted to avoid non-standard tags; I consider
them to be for human use, but I can change that behavior.

Peter, I'll change it to an ACK (as suggested by Kevin) is that's OK by you.

--js