[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] memory: Replace DEBUG_UNASSIGNED printf calls by trace event
|
From: |
Alistair Francis |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] memory: Replace DEBUG_UNASSIGNED printf calls by trace events |
|
Date: |
Tue, 8 Oct 2019 13:41:22 -0700 |
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:41 PM Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 07:20:34 PDT (-0700), Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:17, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> I think it's simplest if all series (RISC-V, remove unassigned_access,
> >> this one) go through the RISC-V tree.
> >
> > I don't inherently object but IME the risc-v tree tends to move
> > comparatively slowly. The initial risc-v conversion patchset
> > should definitely go via the risc-v tree, anyway.
>
> We still don't have the riscv_cpu_unassigned_access() removal patches in,
> which
> IIRC got blocked on review but I can no longer dig out of my inbox. IIRC the
> patches Alistair sent were still "From: Palmer", which means I can't review
> them.
The patches are reviewed by Richard and Philippe, they should be ready to merge.
Alistair
>
> I'm fine taking this on top of those, but it looks like there's still some
> debate about the patch itself. I don't see a v2.
>