[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:29:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
* Felipe Franciosi (address@hidden) wrote:
> Heyall,
>
> We have a use case where a host should self-fence (and all VMs should
> die) if it doesn't hear back from a heartbeat within a certain time
> period. Lots of ideas were floated around where libvirt could take
> care of killing VMs or a separate service could do it. The concern
> with those is that various failures could lead to _those_ services
> being unavailable and the fencing wouldn't be enforced as it should.
>
> Ultimately, it feels like Qemu should be responsible for this
> heartbeat and exit (or execute a custom callback) on timeout.
It doesn't feel doing it inside qemu would be any safer; something
outside QEMU can forcibly emit a kill -9 and qemu *will* stop.
> Does something already exist for this purpose which could be used?
> Would a generic Qemu-fencing infrastructure be something of interest?
Dave
> Cheers,
> F.
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
- Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Felipe Franciosi, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Felipe Franciosi, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Felipe Franciosi, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Felipe Franciosi, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Felipe Franciosi, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Rafael David Tinoco, 2019/09/30
- Re: Thoughts on VM fence infrastructure, Felipe Franciosi, 2019/09/30