qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 32/33] spapr: Move SpaprIrq::nr_xirqs to SpaprMachineClass


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 32/33] spapr: Move SpaprIrq::nr_xirqs to SpaprMachineClass
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:44:41 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 05:22:16PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:27 +1000
> David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > For the benefit of peripheral device allocation, the number of available
> > irqs really wants to be the same on a given machine type version,
> > regardless of what irq backends we are using.  That's the case now, but
> > only because we make sure the different SpaprIrq instances have the same
> > value except for the special legacy one.
> > 
> > Since this really only depends on machine type version, move the value to
> > SpaprMachineClass instead of SpaprIrq.  This also puts the code to set it
> > to the lower value on old machine types right next to setting
> > legacy_irq_allocation, which needs to go hand in hand.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/ppc/spapr.c             |  2 ++
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c         | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h     |  1 +
> >  include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h |  1 -
> >  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > index 34b693beba..7113249c89 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > @@ -4513,6 +4513,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, 
> > void *data)
> >      smc->irq = &spapr_irq_dual;
> >      smc->dr_phb_enabled = true;
> >      smc->linux_pci_probe = true;
> > +    smc->nr_xirqs = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS;
> 
> This is the last user of SPAPR_NR_XIRQS.
> 
> $ git grep SPAPR_NR_XIRQS
> hw/ppc/spapr.c:    smc->nr_xirqs = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS;
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h:#define SPAPR_NR_XIRQS       0x1000
> 
> Maybe open-code it here, like you already do for 
> SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_LEGACY_NR_XIRQS
> below.

I thought about it.  I kind of prefer having the #define, though I'm
not really sure that's a rational choice.

> 
> With or without that fixed.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  static const TypeInfo spapr_machine_info = {
> > @@ -4648,6 +4649,7 @@ static void 
> > spapr_machine_3_0_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
> >      compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_3_0, hw_compat_3_0_len);
> >  
> >      smc->legacy_irq_allocation = true;
> > +    smc->nr_xirqs = 0x400;
> >      smc->irq = &spapr_irq_xics_legacy;
> >  }
> >  
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> > index 799755c811..f76f30f54b 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> > @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ int spapr_irq_init_kvm(int 
> > (*fn)(SpaprInterruptController *, Error **),
> >   */
> >  
> >  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
> > -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS,
> >      .xics        = true,
> >      .xive        = false,
> >  };
> > @@ -116,7 +115,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
> >   */
> >  
> >  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
> > -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS,
> >      .xics        = false,
> >      .xive        = true,
> >  };
> > @@ -134,7 +132,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
> >   * Define values in sync with the XIVE and XICS backend
> >   */
> >  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_dual = {
> > -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_NR_XIRQS,
> >      .xics        = true,
> >      .xive        = true,
> >  };
> > @@ -249,16 +246,19 @@ void spapr_irq_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, uint32_t 
> > nr_servers,
> >  
> >  uint32_t spapr_irq_nr_msis(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
> >  {
> > -    if (SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr)->legacy_irq_allocation) {
> > -        return spapr->irq->nr_xirqs;
> > +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> > +
> > +    if (smc->legacy_irq_allocation) {
> > +        return smc->nr_xirqs;
> >      } else {
> > -        return SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE + spapr->irq->nr_xirqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI;
> > +        return SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE + smc->nr_xirqs - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI;
> >      }
> >  }
> >  
> >  void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
> >  {
> >      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> > +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> >      Error *local_err = NULL;
> >  
> >      if (machine_kernel_irqchip_split(machine)) {
> > @@ -295,8 +295,7 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error 
> > **errp)
> >              goto out;
> >          }
> >  
> > -        object_property_set_int(obj, spapr->irq->nr_xirqs, "nr-irqs",
> > -                                &local_err);
> > +        object_property_set_int(obj, smc->nr_xirqs, "nr-irqs", &local_err);
> >          if (local_err) {
> >              goto out;
> >          }
> > @@ -315,8 +314,7 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error 
> > **errp)
> >          int i;
> >  
> >          dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_SPAPR_XIVE);
> > -        qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "nr-irqs",
> > -                             spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> > +        qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "nr-irqs", smc->nr_xirqs + 
> > SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> >          /*
> >           * 8 XIVE END structures per CPU. One for each available
> >           * priority
> > @@ -343,7 +341,7 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error 
> > **errp)
> >      }
> >  
> >      spapr->qirqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(spapr_set_irq, spapr,
> > -                                      spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + 
> > SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> > +                                      smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> >  
> >  out:
> >      error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> > @@ -351,10 +349,11 @@ out:
> >  
> >  int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, bool lsi, Error 
> > **errp)
> >  {
> > +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> >      int rc;
> >  
> >      assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> > -    assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> > +    assert(irq < (smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> >  
> >      if (spapr->xive) {
> >          SpaprInterruptControllerClass *sicc = 
> > SPAPR_INTC_GET_CLASS(spapr->xive);
> > @@ -379,10 +378,11 @@ int spapr_irq_claim(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int 
> > irq, bool lsi, Error **errp)
> >  
> >  void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num)
> >  {
> > +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> >      int i;
> >  
> >      assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> > -    assert((irq + num) <= (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> > +    assert((irq + num) <= (smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> >  
> >      for (i = irq; i < (irq + num); i++) {
> >          if (spapr->xive) {
> > @@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ void spapr_irq_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, 
> > int num)
> >  
> >  qemu_irq spapr_qirq(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq)
> >  {
> > +    SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> > +
> >      /*
> >       * This interface is basically for VIO and PHB devices to find the
> >       * right qemu_irq to manipulate, so we only allow access to the
> > @@ -410,7 +412,7 @@ qemu_irq spapr_qirq(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq)
> >       * interfaces, we can change this if we need to in future.
> >       */
> >      assert(irq >= SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
> > -    assert(irq < (spapr->irq->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> > +    assert(irq < (smc->nr_xirqs + SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE));
> >  
> >      if (spapr->ics) {
> >          assert(ics_valid_irq(spapr->ics, irq));
> > @@ -563,10 +565,7 @@ int spapr_irq_find(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int num, 
> > bool align, Error **errp)
> >      return first + ics->offset;
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_LEGACY_NR_XIRQS     0x400
> > -
> >  SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics_legacy = {
> > -    .nr_xirqs    = SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_LEGACY_NR_XIRQS,
> >      .xics        = true,
> >      .xive        = false,
> >  };
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > index 763da757f0..623e8e3f93 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct SpaprMachineClass {
> >      bool use_ohci_by_default;  /* use USB-OHCI instead of XHCI */
> >      bool pre_2_10_has_unused_icps;
> >      bool legacy_irq_allocation;
> > +    uint32_t nr_xirqs;
> >      bool broken_host_serial_model; /* present real host info to the guest 
> > */
> >      bool pre_4_1_migration; /* don't migrate hpt-max-page-size */
> >      bool linux_pci_probe;
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> > index 308bfcefd1..73d8beda39 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> > @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ int spapr_irq_msi_alloc(SpaprMachineState *spapr, 
> > uint32_t num, bool align,
> >  void spapr_irq_msi_free(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int irq, uint32_t num);
> >  
> >  typedef struct SpaprIrq {
> > -    uint32_t    nr_xirqs;
> >      bool        xics;
> >      bool        xive;
> >  } SpaprIrq;
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]