Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390x: sclp: refactor invalid command check

[David Hildenbrand]

On 27.09.19 15:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> From: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> 
> Invalid command checking has to be done before the boundary check,
> refactoring it now allows to insert the boundary check at the correct
> place later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Jason J. Herne <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/event-facility.c |  3 ---
>  hw/s390x/sclp.c           | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> index 797ecbb..6620569 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> @@ -377,9 +377,6 @@ static void command_handler(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB 
> *sccb, uint64_t code)
>      case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK:
>          write_event_mask(ef, sccb);
>          break;
> -    default:
> -        sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
> -        break;
>      }
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> index fac7c3b..95ebfe7 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -219,8 +219,23 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, 
> uint32_t code)
>          goto out;
>      }
>  
> -    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
> +    switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) {
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO:
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED:
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_READ_CPU_INFO:
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_CONFIGURE_IOA:
> +    case SCLP_CMDW_DECONFIGURE_IOA:
> +    case SCLP_CMD_READ_EVENT_DATA:
> +    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_DATA:
> +    case SCLP_CMD_WRITE_EVENT_MASK:
> +        break;
> +    default:
> +        work_sccb.h.response_code = 
> cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
> +        goto out_write;
> +    }
>  
> +    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
> +out_write:
>      cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb,
>                                be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
>  
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb